* the map directly affect the cache.
   *
   * <p>Iterators from the returned map are at least <i>weakly consistent</i>: they are safe for
   * concurrent use, but if the cache is modified (including by eviction) after the iterator is
   * created, it is undefined which of the changes (if any) will be reflected in that iterator.
   */
  ConcurrentMap<K, V> asMap();

  /**

// to release associated resources.
//
// Returns:
//   - A Store instance implemented by lruStore, which internally uses an LRU cache with the specified size,
//     eviction callback, and TTL.
func New(size int, ttl time.Duration) Store {
	if size <= 0 {
		size = defaultMaxSize
	}

	if ttl <= 0 {
		ttl = defaultTTL
	}

	onEvicted := func(k string, v *Stmt) {

      Platform.get().logCloseableLeak(message, callReference.callStackTrace)

      references.removeAt(i)

      // If this was the last allocation, the connection is eligible for immediate eviction.
      if (references.isEmpty()) {
        connection.idleAtNs = now - keepAliveDurationNs
        return 0
      }
    }

    return references.size
  }

  /**

         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {

         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {

   * the map directly affect the cache.
   *
   * <p>Iterators from the returned map are at least <i>weakly consistent</i>: they are safe for
   * concurrent use, but if the cache is modified (including by eviction) after the iterator is
   * created, it is undefined which of the changes (if any) will be reflected in that iterator.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning to users of Java 8+:</b> do not call any of the new <i>default methods</i> that

            urlSet.add("http://example" + i + ".com/robots.txt");
        }
        assertEquals(10000, urlSet.size());

        // Add one more should maintain size at 10000 (LRU eviction)
        urlSet.add("http://overflow.com/robots.txt");
        assertEquals(10000, urlSet.size());
        assertTrue(urlSet.contains("http://overflow.com/robots.txt"));

import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests relating to cache eviction: what does and doesn't count toward maximumSize, what happens
 * when maximumSize is reached, etc.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class CacheEvictionTest extends TestCase {

  @Nullable Equivalence<Object> keyEquivalence;

  /**
   * Constructs a new {@code MapMaker} instance with default settings, including strong keys, strong
   * values, and no automatic eviction of any kind.
   */
  public MapMaker() {}

  /**
   * Sets a custom {@code Equivalence} strategy for comparing keys.
   *

                    Smb2LeaseKey key = entry.getKey();
                    LeaseEntry lease = entry.getValue();
                    log.info("Evicting lease for path: {} due to max lease limit", lease.getPath());

                    // Flush any cached data before eviction
                    if (lease.hasWriteCache()) {
                        flushCachedWrites(lease.getPath());
                    }