private val provider: Provider =
    org.openjsse.net.ssl
      .OpenJSSE()

  // Selects TLSv1.3 so we are specific about our intended version ranges (not just 1.3)
  // and because it's a common pattern for VMs to have differences between supported and
  // defaulted versions for TLS based on what is requested.
  override fun newSSLContext(): SSLContext = SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.3", provider)

    // We define the arithmetic means X_n = 1/n \sum_{i=1}^n x_i, and Y_n = 1/n \sum_{i=1}^n y_i.
    // We also define the sum of the products of the differences from the means
    //           C_n = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i - n X_n Y_n
    // for all n >= 1. Then for all n > 1:
    //       C_{n-1} = \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} x_i y_i - (n-1) X_{n-1} Y_{n-1}

            // Log the size mismatch for debugging but don't throw exception
            // This can occur due to padding alignment differences between size8() and pad8()
            if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
                log.debug("Size calculation mismatch: expected {} but got {} (difference: {})", exp, actual, actual - exp);
            }
        }
        return len;
    }

    /**
     * {@inheritDoc}

    assertThat(graph).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets and node/edge connections are the same, but graph properties differ.
  // In this case the graphs are considered equivalent; the property differences are irrelevant.
  @Test
  public void equivalent_propertiesDiffer() {
    graph.putEdge(N1, N2);

    MutableGraph<Integer> g2 =
        GraphBuilder.from(graph).allowsSelfLoops(!graph.allowsSelfLoops()).build();

 */
class ConscryptPlatform private constructor() : Platform() {
  private val provider: Provider = Conscrypt.newProvider()

  // See release notes https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/conscrypt
  // for version differences
  override fun newSSLContext(): SSLContext =
    // supports TLSv1.3 by default (version api is >= 1.4.0)
    SSLContext.getInstance("TLS", provider)

  override fun platformTrustManager(): X509TrustManager {

    MapDifference<Integer, String> original = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> same = Maps.difference(left, right);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> reverse = Maps.difference(right, left);
    MapDifference<Integer, String> diff2 = Maps.difference(left, right2);

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(original, same)

Also, the best approach was to use already existing standards.

So, before even starting to code **FastAPI**, I spent several months studying the specs for OpenAPI, JSON Schema, OAuth2, etc. Understanding their relationship, overlap, and differences.

## Design { #design }

Then I spent some time designing the developer "API" I wanted to have as a user (as a developer using FastAPI).

    assertThat(network).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets and node/edge connections are the same, but network properties differ.
  // (In this case the networks are considered equivalent; the property differences are irrelevant.)
  @Test
  public void equivalent_propertiesDiffer() {
    network.addEdge(N1, N2, E12);

    MutableNetwork<Integer, String> g2 =
        NetworkBuilder.from(network)

    assertThat(network).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets and node/edge connections are the same, but network properties differ.
  // (In this case the networks are considered equivalent; the property differences are irrelevant.)
  @Test
  public void equivalent_propertiesDiffer() {
    network.addEdge(N1, N2, E12);

    MutableNetwork<Integer, String> g2 =
        NetworkBuilder.from(network)

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Comparing two approaches to a use case side by side can make it easier to examine the
        differences between them.


        Additionally, it's very useful to us if you can provide a "straw API" — what the
        method signatures would look like, for example, even if the method and class names are still