A single HTTP call may require follow-up requests to be made to handle authentication challenges, redirects, and HTTP-layer timeouts. In such cases multiple connections, requests, and responses may be attempted. Follow-ups are another reason a single call may trigger multiple events of the same type.

 * connection is typically faster than establishing a new one.
 *
 * When a single logical call requires multiple streams due to redirects or authorization
 * challenges, we prefer to use the same physical connection for all streams in the sequence. There
 * are potential performance and behavior consequences to this preference. To support this feature,

    if (header.matches("\\d+".toRegex())) {
      return Integer.valueOf(header)
    }
    return Integer.MAX_VALUE
  }

  companion object {
    /**
     * How many redirects and auth challenges should we attempt? Chrome follows 21 redirects; Firefox,
     * curl, and wget follow 20; Safari follows 16; and HTTP/1.0 recommends 5.
     */
    private const val MAX_FOLLOW_UPS = 20
  }

    }

    /**
     * Test the service method when no Authorization header is present and no session exists.
     * Expects a 401 Unauthorized response with NTLM and Basic authentication challenges.
     * @throws ServletException
     * @throws IOException
     */
    @Test
    void testService_NoAuthHeader_NoSession() throws ServletException, IOException {
        ntlmServlet.init(servletConfig);

  }

  @Test
  fun challenge() {
    var challenge = Challenge("", mapOf("" to ""))
    challenge = Challenge("", "")
    val scheme: String = challenge.scheme
    val authParams: Map<String?, String> = challenge.authParams
    val realm: String? = challenge.realm
    val charset: Charset = challenge.charset
    val utf8: Challenge = challenge.withCharset(Charsets.UTF_8)
  }

  @Test

 *
 *  * [TCP handshake][connectSocket]
 *  * Optional [CONNECT tunnels][connectTunnel]. When using an HTTP proxy to reach an HTTPS server
 *    we must send a `CONNECT` request, and handle authorization challenges from the proxy.
 *  * Optional [TLS handshake][connectTls].
 *
 * Each step may fail. If a retry is possible, a new instance is created with the next plan, which
 * will be configured differently.
 */
class ConnectPlan(

     * @param password the password to hash
     * @param challenge the server challenge bytes
     * @return the calculated response
     * @throws GeneralSecurityException if a cryptographic error occurs
     */
    public static byte[] getNTLMResponse(final String password, final byte[] challenge) throws GeneralSecurityException {
        return getNTLMResponse(getNTHash(password), challenge);
    }

    /**

        // Since we can't mock the internal transport operations easily without real network,
        // we'll test the simpler case where no NTLM negotiation is needed
        when(request.getHeader("Authorization")).thenReturn(null);

        filter.doFilter(request, response, filterChain);

        // Should challenge the client

   *
   * The network response's status code is most influential when deciding how to follow up:
   *
   *  * For redirects (301: Moved Permanently, 302: Temporary Redirect, etc.)
   *  * For auth challenges (401: Unauthorized, 407: Proxy Authentication Required.)
   *  * For client timeouts (408: Request Time-Out.)
   *  * For server failures (503: Service Unavailable.)
   *

    application code to omit a message.

 *  The challenge's scheme and realm are now non-null. If you are calling
    `new Challenge(scheme, realm)` you must provide non-null values. These were
    never null in challenges created by OkHttp, but could have been null in
    application code that creates challenges.

 *  New: The `TlsVersion` of a `Handshake` is now non-null. If you are calling