} else {
        oldCell.merge(value, merger);
      }
    }

    /*
     * While the current implementation returns `this`, that's not something we mean to guarantee.
     * Anyway, the purpose of this method is to implement a BinaryOperator combiner for a Collector,
     * so its return value will get used naturally.
     */
    @SuppressWarnings("CanIgnoreReturnValueSuggester")

      "Unexpected default trust managers: ${trustManagers.contentToString()}"
    }
    val x509TrustManager = trustManagers[0] as X509TrustManager
    // Disabled because OkHttp will run anyway
    Conscrypt.setHostnameVerifier(x509TrustManager, DisabledHostnameVerifier)
    return x509TrustManager
  }

  internal object DisabledHostnameVerifier : ConscryptHostnameVerifier {
    fun verify(

    arraycopy(contents, 0, result, 0, contents.length);
    return result;
  }

  /*
   * a "type A" unmodifiable collection freaks out proactively, even if there
   * wasn't going to be any actual work to do anyway
   */

  @Override
  public boolean addAll(Collection<? extends E> elementsToAdd) {
    throw up();
  }

  @Override
  public boolean removeAll(Collection<?> elementsToRemove) {
    throw up();

  }

  // Technically we should test other reentrant scenarios (9 combinations of
  // hasNext/next/peek), but we'll cop out for now, knowing that peek() and
  // next() both start by invoking hasNext() anyway.

  }

  // Technically we should test other reentrant scenarios (9 combinations of
  // hasNext/next/peek), but we'll cop out for now, knowing that peek() and
  // next() both start by invoking hasNext() anyway.

     * we can override it in our non-null-guaranteeing subtypes to present a better signature to
     * their users.
     *
     * However, the checker *we* use has this special knowledge about `Collection.toArray()` anyway,
     * so in our implementation code, we can rely on that. That's why the expression below
     * type-checks.
     */
    return super.toArray();
  }

        } else {
            paths.put(id, path);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Retrieve a stream of the project's artifacts.
     * Do not include the POM artifact as the file can't be set anyway.
     */
    private Stream<org.apache.maven.artifact.Artifact> getProjectArtifacts(MavenProject project) {
        return Stream.concat(Stream.of(project.getArtifact()), project.getAttachedArtifacts().stream());
    }

    if (isAndroid()) {
      /*
       * The test calls directly into the "ACL-based filesystem" code, which isn't available under
       * old versions of Android. Since Android doesn't use that code path, anyway, there's no need
       * to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based

/**
 * Unit test for {@link Resources}.
 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 */

@NullUnmarked
public class ResourcesTest extends IoTestCase {

  @AndroidIncompatible // wouldn't run anyway, but strip the source entirely because of b/230620681
  public static TestSuite suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
    suite.addTest(
        ByteSourceTester.tests(

        if (method.getDeclaringClass().equals(TypeVariableImpl.class)) {
          try {
            method.setAccessible(true);
          } catch (AccessControlException e) {
            // OK: the method is accessible to us anyway. The setAccessible call is only for
            // unusual execution environments where that might not be true.
          }
          builder.put(method.getName(), method);
        }
      }