assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("connected");

    // adjacent below
    assertEquals(Range.closedOpen(4, 4), range.intersection(Range.closedOpen(2, 4)));

    // overlap below
    assertEquals(Range.closed(4, 6), range.intersection(Range.closed(2, 6)));

    // enclosed with same start
    assertEquals(Range.closed(4, 6), range.intersection(Range.closed(4, 6)));

Translate to Russian (русский язык).

Language code: ru.

---

Use a neutral tone (not overly formal or informal).

Use correct Russian grammar — appropriate cases, suffixes, and endings depending on context.

For the following technical terms, use these specific translations to ensure consistency and clarity across the documentation:

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: orthogonality
    attributes:
      label: "Orthogonality: How does this change interact or overlap with existing features?"
      description: "Is the goal of this change a performance improvement? If so, what quantifiable improvement should we expect? How would we measure it?"
    validations:
      required: false

   * Overlapping ranges and empty ranges are forbidden, though adjacent ranges are permitted and
   * will be merged.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if any ranges overlap or are empty
   * @since 21.0
   */
  public static <C extends Comparable<?>> ImmutableRangeSet<C> copyOf(Iterable<Range<C>> ranges) {
    return new ImmutableRangeSet.Builder<C>().addAll(ranges).build();
  }

        checkInvalidRange("[1.0,1.0)");
        checkInvalidRange("(1.0,1.0)");
        checkInvalidRange("[1.1,1.0]");
        checkInvalidRange("[1.0,1.2),1.3");
        // overlap
        checkInvalidRange("[1.0,1.2),(1.1,1.3]");
        // overlap
        checkInvalidRange("[1.1,1.3),(1.0,1.2]");
        // ordering
        checkInvalidRange("(1.1,1.2],[1.0,1.1)");
    }

    @Test

Also, the best approach was to use already existing standards.

So, before even starting to code **FastAPI**, I spent several months studying the specs for OpenAPI, JSON Schema, OAuth2, etc. Understanding their relationship, overlap, and differences.

## Design { #design }

Then I spent some time designing the developer "API" I wanted to have as a user (as a developer using FastAPI).

        for (RemoteRepository repository : repositories) {
            result = 31 * result + repositoryHashCode(repository);
        }
        return result;
    }

    public static RepositorySystemSession overlay(
            ArtifactRepository repository, RepositorySystemSession session, RepositorySystem system) {
        if (repository == null || repository.getBasedir() == null) {
            return session;
        }

justify-content: center;\n  z-index: 50;\n}\n\n.card .overlay > .fa,\n.card .overlay > .fas,\n.card .overlay > .far,\n.card .overlay > .fab,\n.card .overlay > .fal,\n.card .overlay > .fad,\n.card .overlay > .svg-inline--fa,\n.card .overlay > .ion,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .fa,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .fas,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .far,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .fab,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .fal,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .fad,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .svg-inline--fa,\n.overlay-wrapper...

.overlay>.fad,.overlay-wrapper .overlay>.fal,.overlay-wrapper .overlay>.far,.overlay-wrapper .overlay>.fas,.overlay-wrapper .overlay>.ion,.overlay-wrapper .overlay>.svg-inline--fa,.small-box .overlay>.fa,.small-box .overlay>.fab,.small-box .overlay>.fad,.small-box .overlay>.fal,.small-box .overlay>.far,.small-box .overlay>.fas,.small-box .overlay>.ion,.small-box .overlay>.svg-inline--fa{color:#343a40}.card .overlay.dark,.info-box .overlay.dark,.overlay-wrapper .overlay.dark,.small-box .overlay.dark{backg...

                assertNotEquals(attributes[i], attributes[j], "Attributes should have distinct values");
                assertEquals(0, attributes[i] & attributes[j], "Attributes should not overlap in bit patterns");
            }
        }
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should have resource types with power-of-2 values")
    void testResourceTypeBitPatterns() {