labels: kind/feature
body:
  - type: textarea
    id: feature
    attributes:
      label: What would you like to be added?
      description: |
        Feature requests are unlikely to make progress as issues. Please consider engaging with SIGs on slack and mailing lists, instead.
        A proposal that works through the design along with the implications of the change can be opened as a KEP.

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Signifies that a test should not be run under Android. This annotation is respected only by our
 * Google-internal Android suite generators. Note that those generators also suppress any test
 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *

  public void testConstraint() {
    /*
     * We'll give ourselves a pass on testing all the possible ways of breaking the constraint,
     * because we know that newClassMap() is implemented using ConstrainedMap which is itself
     * well-tested. A purist would object to this, but what can I say, we're dirty cheaters.
     */
    map.put(Integer.class, new Integer(5));

  }

  /**
   * Returns the {@link Method} instance for {@link #testAddAll_unsupportedNonePresent()} so that
   * tests can suppress it with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} while we
   * figure out what to do with <a

     * extra state from AbstractFuture), our options are limited: A call to setException() would be
     * a no-op. We could log, but if that's what we really want, we should modify
     * AbstractFuture.executeListener to do so, since that method would have the ability to continue
     * to execute other listeners.
     *

---
name: Feature request
about: Suggest an idea
title: ''
labels: enhancement
assignees: ''

---

Start by telling us what problem you’re trying to solve. Often a solution already exists!

     * extra state from AbstractFuture), our options are limited: A call to setException() would be
     * a no-op. We could log, but if that's what we really want, we should modify
     * AbstractFuture.executeListener to do so, since that method would have the ability to continue
     * to execute other listeners.
     *

 * }
 *
 * The calls to {@link #isSubtype} and {@link #notSubtype} tells the framework what assertions need
 * to be made.
 *
 * <p>The declaration methods must be public.
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // only used by android incompatible tests.
@NullUnmarked
abstract class SubtypeTester implements Cloneable {

  /** Annotates a public method that declares subtype assertion. */
  @RequiredModifiers(Modifier.PUBLIC)

[using Guava in your build]: https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/UseGuavaInYourBuild
[repackage]: https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/UseGuavaInYourBuild#what-if-i-want-to-use-beta-apis-from-a-library-that-people-use-as-a-dependency

/**
 * A set of worker threads that are shared among a set of task queues.
 *
 * Use [INSTANCE] for a task runner that uses daemon threads. There is not currently a shared
 * instance for non-daemon threads.
 *
 * The task runner is also responsible for releasing held threads when the library is unloaded.
 * This is for the benefit of container environments that implement code unloading.
 *