}

  @Test
  @TestMetadata("getClass_variable.kt")
  public void testGetClass_variable() {
    runTest("analysis/analysis-api/testData/components/typeInfoProvider/doubleColonReceiverType/getClass_variable.kt");
  }

  @Test
  @TestMetadata("methodReference_java.kt")
  public void testMethodReference_java() {

   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the

		logger.Fatal(config.ErrInvalidBrowserValue(err), "Invalid MINIO_BROWSER value in environment variable")
	}
	if globalBrowserEnabled {
		if redirectURL := env.Get(config.EnvBrowserRedirectURL, ""); redirectURL != "" {
			u, err := xnet.ParseHTTPURL(redirectURL)
			if err != nil {
				logger.Fatal(err, "Invalid MINIO_BROWSER_REDIRECT_URL value in environment variable")
			}
			// Look for if URL has invalid values and return error.

### Classes en tant que types

Vous pouvez aussi déclarer une classe comme type d'une variable.

Disons que vous avez une classe `Person`, avec une variable `name` :

```Python hl_lines="1-3"
{!../../../docs_src/python_types/tutorial010.py!}
```

Vous pouvez ensuite déclarer une variable de type `Person` :

```Python hl_lines="6"
{!../../../docs_src/python_types/tutorial010.py!}
```

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code