bucketPolicyTemplate := `{"Version":"2012-10-17","Statement":[{"Sid":"","Effect":"Allow","Principal":{"AWS":["*"]},"Action":["s3:GetBucketLocation","s3:ListBucket"],"Resource":["arn:aws:s3:::%s"]},{"Sid":"","Effect":"Allow","Principal":{"AWS":["*"]},"Action":["s3:GetObject"],"Resource":["arn:aws:s3:::%s/this*"]}]}`

   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),

vulnerabilities.

## Security properties of execution modes

TensorFlow has several execution modes, with Eager-mode being the default in v2.
Eager mode lets users write imperative-style statements that can be easily
inspected and debugged and it is intended to be used during the development
phase.

As part of the differences that make Eager mode easier to debug, the [shape
inference

Create functions with a name that starts with `test_` (this is standard `pytest` conventions).

Use the `TestClient` object the same way as you do with `httpx`.

Write simple `assert` statements with the standard Python expressions that you need to check (again, standard `pytest`).

{* ../../docs_src/app_testing/tutorial001.py hl[2,12,15:18] *}

/// tip

emailing [******@****.***][codeofconduct_at]. For more details, please see our Reporting
Guidelines below.

Thanks
------

Some of the ideas and wording for the statements and guidelines above were based on work by the
[Twitter][twitter_coc], [Ubuntu][ubuntu_coc], [GDC][gdc_coc], and [Django][django_coc] communities.
We are thankful for their work.

Reporting Guide
---------------

   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),

## Conflict Resolution

Conflicts in an open source project can take many forms, from someone having a bad day and using harsh and hurtful language in the issue queue, to more serious instances such as sexist/racist statements or threats of violence, and everything in between.

If the behavior is threatening or harassing, or for other reasons requires immediate escalation, please see below.

			asRoot: false,

			// It looks like this should allow listing any key that isn't "default-test-key", however
			// the policy engine matches all Deny statements first, without regard to Resources (for KMS).
			// This is for backwards compatibility where historically KMS statements ignored Resources.
			policy: `{
						"Effect": "Allow",
						"Action": ["kms:ListKeys"]
					},{
						"Effect": "Deny",

- **XML Processing** (`org.codelibs.core.xml`) - XML DOM utilities, SAX parser helpers, and schema validation support
- **SQL Utilities** (`org.codelibs.core.sql`) - JDBC helper methods for result sets, prepared statements, and connection management
- **Network & I/O** (`org.codelibs.core.net`, `org.codelibs.core.nio`) - URL utilities, UUID generation, MIME type detection, and NIO channel operations

## 🚀 Getting Started

### Requirements

		// close prepared statement, because SavePoint not support prepared statement.
		// e.g. mysql8.0 doc: https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/sql-prepared-statements.html
		var (
			preparedStmtTx   *PreparedStmtTX
			isPreparedStmtTx bool
		)
		// close prepared statement, because SavePoint not support prepared statement.
		if preparedStmtTx, isPreparedStmtTx = db.Statement.ConnPool.(*PreparedStmtTX); isPreparedStmtTx {