/// info | Información

Desafortunadamente, no puedo simplemente confiar en PRs que solo tienen varias aprobaciones.

Varias veces ha sucedido que hay PRs con 3, 5 o más aprobaciones, probablemente porque la descripción es atractiva, pero cuando reviso los PRs, en realidad están rotos, tienen un bug, o no resuelven el problema que dicen resolver. 😅

/// info

Unfortunately, I can't simply trust PRs that just have several approvals.

Several times it has happened that there are PRs with 3, 5 or more approvals, probably because the description is appealing, but when I check the PRs, they are actually broken, have a bug, or don't solve the problem they claim to solve. 😅

    labels:
      - "@dev-productivity"
      - "a:chore"
      - "in:building-gradle"
  - package-ecosystem: "maven"
    directory: "/.teamcity"
    cooldown:
      default-days: 7 # don't immediately create PRs for available updates
    schedule:
      interval: "daily"
    labels:
      - "@dev-productivity"
      - "a:chore"

description: File a bug report
labels: ["bug"]

body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
        Thanks for taking the time to fill out this bug report.     

        Simple fixes in single PRs do not require issues. 
  
        **Do you use the latest project version?**

  - type: input
    id: version
    attributes:
      label: Affected version
    validations:
      required: true

  - cron: "0 2 * * *"

permissions:
  contents: read

jobs:
  stale:
    permissions:
      issues: write  # for actions/stale to close stale issues
      pull-requests: write  # for actions/stale to close stale PRs
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    env:
      ACTIONS_STEP_DEBUG: true
    steps:
    - name: Close Stale Issues
      uses: actions/stale@v8
      with:
        repo-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

/// info | Info

Leider kann ich PRs, nur weil sie von mehreren gutgeheißen wurden, nicht einfach vertrauen.

Es ist mehrmals passiert, dass es PRs mit drei, fünf oder mehr Zustimmungen gibt, wahrscheinlich weil die Beschreibung ansprechend ist, aber wenn ich die PRs überprüfe, sind sie tatsächlich fehlerhaft, haben einen Bug, oder lösen das Problem nicht, welches sie behaupten, zu lösen. 😅

on:
  push:
  pull_request_target:
    types: [synchronize]

jobs:
  main:
    permissions:
      contents: read
      pull-requests: write
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Check if PRs have merge conflicts
        uses: eps1lon/actions-label-merge-conflict@v3
        with:
          dirtyLabel: "conflicts"
          repoToken: "${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}"

permissions: {}

jobs:
  check_pull_metadata:
    permissions:
      issues: write
      pull-requests: write
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      # Check that PRs have proper metadata: labels and milestone
      # https://github.com/gradle/issue-management-action/blob/main/src/pull-metadata.ts

/// info | Informação

Infelizmente, eu não posso simplesmente confiar em PRs que têm várias aprovações.

Já aconteceu várias vezes de haver PRs com 3, 5 ou mais aprovações, provavelmente porque a descrição é atraente, mas quando eu verifico os PRs, eles estão quebrados, têm um bug, ou não resolvem o problema que afirmam resolver. 😅

  - cron: "*/10 * * * *"

permissions:
  contents: read

jobs:
  stale:
    permissions:
      issues: write  # for actions/stale to close stale issues
      pull-requests: write  # for actions/stale to close stale PRs
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    env:
      ACTIONS_STEP_DEBUG: true
    steps:
    - name: Close Stale Issues
      uses: actions/stale@v8
      with:
        repo-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}