* </ul>
 *
 * <h2>Usage Examples</h2>
 *
 * <h3>Check for Available Upgrades</h3>
 * <pre>{@code
 * mvnup check
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h3>Apply All Upgrades</h3>
 * <pre>{@code
 * mvnup apply --all
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h3>Upgrade to Maven 4.1.0 with Inference</h3>
 * <pre>{@code
 * mvnup apply --model 4.1.0 --infer
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h2>Extension Points</h2>
 *
 * <p>To add new upgrade strategies:</p>
 * <ol>

     * This should be the resulting ordering of plugins after merging:
     * <p>
     * Given:
     * <pre>
     * parent: X -&gt; A -&gt; B -&gt; D -&gt; E
     * child: Y -&gt; A -&gt; C -&gt; D -&gt; F
     * </pre>
     * Result:
     * <pre>
     * X -&gt; Y -&gt; A -&gt; B -&gt; C -&gt; D -&gt; E -&gt; F
     * </pre>
     */
    public static void mergePluginLists(

     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0
     * </pre>

     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0
     * </pre>

     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0
     * </pre>

                                <version>3.2.0</version>
                                <executions>
                                    <execution>
                                        <id>pre-clean-test</id>
                                        <phase>pre-clean</phase>
                                        <goals>
                                            <goal>clean</goal>
                                        </goals>

 * set one of the following:</p>
 *
 * <h3>Option 1: Set base URL (recommended for simplicity)</h3>
 * <pre>
 * # All SP URLs will be derived from this base URL
 * saml.sp.base.url=https://your-fess-server.example.com
 * </pre>
 *
 * <h3>Option 2: Set individual SP URLs</h3>
 * <pre>
 * # SP Entity ID (Audience URI in IdP)
 * saml.sp.entityid=https://your-fess-server.example.com/sso/metadata
 *

For example, a compiler must not invert the conditional in this program:
</p>

<pre>
*p = 1
if cond {
	*p = 2
}
</pre>

<p>
That is, the compiler must not rewrite the program into this one:
</p>

<pre>
*p = 2
if !cond {
	*p = 1
}
</pre>

<p>
If <code>cond</code> is false and another goroutine is reading <code>*p</code>,

        }
    }

    // CHECKSTYLE_OFF: LineLength
    /**
     * <pre>&gt;&gt;&gt; mojo-artifactId:version:goal (mojo-executionId) &gt; :forked-goal @ project-artifactId &gt;&gt;&gt;</pre>
     * <pre>&gt;&gt;&gt; mojo-artifactId:version:goal (mojo-executionId) &gt; [lifecycle]phase @ project-artifactId &gt;&gt;&gt;</pre>
     */
    // CHECKSTYLE_ON: LineLength
    @Override

 * </tr>
 * <tr>
 * <td >
 *
 * <pre>
 * new SmbNamedPipe("smb://server/IPC$/PIPE/foo", SmbNamedPipe.PIPE_TYPE_RDWR | SmbNamedPipe.PIPE_TYPE_CALL, context);
 * </pre>
 *
 * </td>
 * <td>
 * Open the Named Pipe foo for reading and writing. The pipe will behave like the <code>CallNamedPipe</code> interface.
 * </td>
 * </tr>
 * <tr>
 * <td >
 *
 * <pre>