## Date

2012-12-01

## Context

In Gradle we often need to serialize in-memory objects for caching, or to transmit them across process barriers, etc.
Java serialization is one way to implement this, however, despite its simplicity of implementation, it has several drawbacks:

- **Performance:**
Java's built-in serialization mechanism is often slower compared to other serialization solutions.

---
name: Feature request
about: Suggest an idea
title: ''
labels: enhancement
assignees: ''

---

Start by telling us what problem you’re trying to solve. Often a solution already exists!

   | * type: the type of tool. An often used value is 'jdk'. Toolchains-aware
   |   plugins should document which type you must use.
   |
   | * provides: A list of key/value-pairs.
   |   Based on the toolchain-configuration in the pom.xml Maven will search for
   |   matching <provides/> configuration. You can decide for yourself which key-value
   |   pairs to use. Often used keys are 'version', 'vendor' and 'arch'. By default

    * FastAPI должно сравнивать с фреймворками веб-приложений (или наборами инструментов), которые обеспечивают валидацию и сериализацию данных, а также предоставляют автоматическую документацию, такими как Flask-apispec, NestJS, Molten и им подобные....

    Sie müssen also sicherstellen, dass Ihre Daten vom richtigen Typ sind. Z. B. sollten diese mit JSON kompatibel sein, wenn Sie eine `JSONResponse` zurückgeben.

    Und auch, dass Sie keine Daten senden, die durch ein `response_model` hätten gefiltert werden sollen.

### Mehr Informationen

!!! note "Technische Details"
    Sie können auch `from starlette.responses import Response` oder `from starlette.responses import JSONResponse` verwenden.

    * Si estás comparando FastAPI, compáralo con un framework de aplicaciones web (o conjunto de herramientas) que proporciona validación, serialización y documentación de datos, como Flask-apispec, NestJS, Molten, etc. Frameworks con validación, serialización y documentación automáticas integradas....

    * If you are comparing FastAPI, compare it against a web application framework (or set of tools) that provides data validation, serialization and documentation, like Flask-apispec, NestJS, Molten, etc. Frameworks with integrated automatic data validation, serialization and documentation....

 * (or {@link FluentFuture#transform(com.google.common.base.Function, Executor)
 * FluentFuture.transform}), but you will often find it easier to use a framework. Frameworks
 * automate the process, often adding features like monitoring, debugging, and cancellation.
 * Examples of frameworks include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li><a href="https://dagger.dev/producers.html">Dagger Producers</a>

**`kube.Client`** is a fairly light wrapper around Kubernetes clients, but offers quite a few benefits.
Istio consumes _many_ different types of clients (at the time of writing, 7), as well as informers for each of these.
Additionally, we often need to convert to various different client forms for different libraries we integrate with.

`kube.Client` just bundles these all in one place, so we have a single object to pass around anywhere we need Kubernetes access.

    * Eğer FastAPI'ı karşılaştırıyorsanız, Flask-apispec, NestJS, Molten, vb. gibi veri doğrulama, dönüştürme ve dokümantasyon sağlayan bir web uygulaması frameworkü ile (veya araç setiyle) karşılaştırın....