*
 * As persistence, implementations of this interface must also provide storage of cookies. Simple
 * implementations may store cookies in memory; sophisticated ones may use the file system or
 * database to hold accepted cookies. The [cookie storage model][rfc_6265_53] specifies policies for
 * updating and expiring cookies.
 *
 * [rfc_6265_53]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265#section-5.3
 */
interface CookieJar {
  /**

type httpListener struct {
	opts        TCPOptions
	listeners   []net.Listener    // underlying TCP listeners.
	acceptCh    chan acceptResult // channel where all TCP listeners write accepted connection.
	ctxDoneCh   <-chan struct{}
	ctxCanceler context.CancelFunc
}

// start - starts separate goroutine for each TCP listener.  A valid new connection is passed to httpListener.acceptCh.

# ADR-0001 - Use Architectural Decision Records

## Status

- ACCEPTED on 2023-12-01

## Context

In a distributed team with many subteams, the best solution to communicate decisions is to use a format accessible by everyone in charge of development.

We use *Specification* and *Discovery* documents stored in Google Drive, but they present some downsides:

        // Threshold of 0 should be accepted
        request.threshold(0);

        assertEquals(0, request.threshold());
    }

    @Test
    public void testThresholdWithNegative() {
        CurlRequest request = new CurlRequest(Method.GET, "https://example.com");

        // Negative threshold should be accepted (though may not make sense)
        request.threshold(-1);

If your CL addresses an accepted proposal, mention the proposal issue number in
your release note in the form `/issue/NUMBER`. A link to the issue in the text
will have this form (see below). If you don't want to mention the issue in the
text, add it as a comment:
```
<!-- go.dev/issue/12345 -->
```
If an accepted proposal is mentioned in a CL but not in the release notes, it will be

This includes adding the description of the changes to the `accepted-public-api-changes.json` file, and providing a reason for each change.
You can add the changes to any place in the file, e.g. at the top.

3. Make sure the file with accepted changes is sorted.\
Use the `./gradlew :architecture-test:sortAcceptedApiChanges` task to sort the file.

 * limitations under the License.
 */
package okhttp3

import okio.ByteString

abstract class WebSocketListener {
  /**
   * Invoked when a web socket has been accepted by the remote peer and may begin transmitting
   * messages.
   */
  open fun onOpen(
    webSocket: WebSocket,
    response: Response,
  ) {
  }

    id: generics-proposal
    attributes:
      label: Is this about generics?
      description: If so, how does this relate to the accepted design and other generics proposals?
      placeholder: |
       Yes or No

       If yes, 
        1. how does this relate to the accepted design and other generics proposals?

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: proposal
    attributes:

import org.gradle.api.tasks.PathSensitive
import org.gradle.api.tasks.PathSensitivity
import org.gradle.api.tasks.TaskAction
import org.gradle.work.DisableCachingByDefault

/**
 * A task used for cleaning up all accepted API changes. The functionality is called whenever the release process initiates "branching".
 */
@DisableCachingByDefault(because = "Not worth caching")
abstract class CleanAcceptedApiChanges extends DefaultTask {

var errSftpPublicKeyWithoutCert = errors.New("public key authentication without certificate is not accepted")

// error returned in SFTP when user used certificate which does not contain principal(s)
var errSftpCertWithoutPrincipals = errors.New("certificates without principal(s) are not accepted")

// error returned when group name contains reserved characters