* `server_max_window_bits`. This harms our ability to support these parameters:
 *
 *  * If `client_max_window_bits` is less than 15, OkHttp must close the web socket with code 1010.
 *    Otherwise it would compress values in a way that servers could not decompress.
 *  * If `server_max_window_bits` is less than 15, OkHttp will waste memory on an oversized buffer.
 *

    assertThat(Doubles.contains(EMPTY, 1.0)).isFalse();
    assertThat(Doubles.contains(ARRAY1, 2.0)).isFalse();
    assertThat(Doubles.contains(ARRAY234, 1.0)).isFalse();
    assertThat(Doubles.contains(new double[] {-1.0}, -1.0)).isTrue();
    assertThat(Doubles.contains(ARRAY234, 2.0)).isTrue();
    assertThat(Doubles.contains(ARRAY234, 3.0)).isTrue();
    assertThat(Doubles.contains(ARRAY234, 4.0)).isTrue();

		<la:select property="num" styleId="numSearchOption"
			styleClass="form-control">
			<option value="10">
				<la:message key="labels.search_result_select_num" />
			</option>
			<la:option value="10">10</la:option>
			<la:option value="20">20</la:option>
			<la:option value="30">30</la:option>
			<la:option value="40">40</la:option>
			<la:option value="50">50</la:option>
			<la:option value="100">100</la:option>

		<la:select property="num" styleId="numSearchOption"
			styleClass="form-control">
			<option value="10">
				<la:message key="labels.search_result_select_num" />
			</option>
			<la:option value="10">10</la:option>
			<la:option value="20">20</la:option>
			<la:option value="30">30</la:option>
			<la:option value="40">40</la:option>
			<la:option value="50">50</la:option>
			<la:option value="100">100</la:option>

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test safe integer multiplication")
    void testSafeMultiplication() {
        assertEquals(100, InputValidator.safeMultiply(10, 10));
        assertEquals(-100, InputValidator.safeMultiply(10, -10));

        assertThrows(ArithmeticException.class, () -> InputValidator.safeMultiply(Integer.MAX_VALUE, 2));

  // Double#doubleToRawLongBits(double)} spec.
  static final long SIGN_MASK = 0x8000000000000000L;

  static final int SIGNIFICAND_BITS = 52;

  static final int EXPONENT_BIAS = 1023;

  /** The implicit 1 bit that is omitted in significands of normal doubles. */
  static final long IMPLICIT_BIT = SIGNIFICAND_MASK + 1;

  static long getSignificand(double d) {

"1.1.1 OK"
"1.1.2 OK"
"1.1.3 OK"
"1.1.4 OK"
"1.1.5 OK"
"1.1.6 OK"
"1.1.7 OK"
"1.1.8 OK"
"1.2.1 OK"
"1.2.2 OK"
"1.2.3 OK"
"1.2.4 OK"
"1.2.5 OK"
"1.2.6 OK"
"1.2.7 OK"
"1.2.8 OK"
"10.1.1 OK"
"12.1.1 UNIMPLEMENTED"
"12.1.10 UNIMPLEMENTED"
"12.1.11 UNIMPLEMENTED"
"12.1.12 UNIMPLEMENTED"
"12.1.13 UNIMPLEMENTED"
"12.1.14 UNIMPLEMENTED"
"12.1.15 UNIMPLEMENTED"
"12.1.16 UNIMPLEMENTED"
"12.1.17 UNIMPLEMENTED"

    // separate above
    expected =
        assertThrows(
            IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> range.intersection(Range.closed(10, 12)));
    assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("connected");
  }

  public void testGap_overlapping() {
    Range<Integer> range = Range.closedOpen(3, 5);

          k2 ^= (long) toUnsignedInt(bb.get(12)) << 32; // fall through
        case 12:
          k2 ^= (long) toUnsignedInt(bb.get(11)) << 24; // fall through
        case 11:
          k2 ^= (long) toUnsignedInt(bb.get(10)) << 16; // fall through
        case 10:
          k2 ^= (long) toUnsignedInt(bb.get(9)) << 8; // fall through
        case 9:
          k2 ^= (long) toUnsignedInt(bb.get(8)); // fall through
        case 8:

   * (10, ∞) => "baz"} then {@code rangeMap.subRangeMap(Range.open(3, 12))} would return a range map
   * with the entries {@code (3, 5] => "foo", (6, 8) => "bar", (10, 12) => "baz"}.
   *
   * <p>The returned range map supports all optional operations that this range map supports, except
   * for {@code asMapOfRanges().iterator().remove()}.
   *