@Override
    public Entry<String, Integer>[] createArray(int length) {
      return (Entry<String, Integer>[]) new Entry<?, ?>[length];
    }

    @Override
    public Iterable<Entry<String, Integer>> order(List<Entry<String, Integer>> insertionOrder) {
      return insertionOrder;
    }

    @Override
    public List<Entry<String, Integer>> create(Object... elements) {

   * comes from a data structure supporting efficient indexed random access, typically an array or
   * list.
   *
   * <p>The order of the resulting stream is defined if and only if the order of the original stream
   * was defined.
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, R extends @Nullable Object> Stream<R> mapWithIndex(

  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable map whose keys are the distinct elements of this {@code FluentIterable}
   * and whose value for each key was computed by {@code valueFunction}. The map's iteration order
   * is the order of the first appearance of each key in this iterable.
   *
   * <p>When there are multiple instances of a key in this iterable, it is unspecified whether

   *         .put(2, 'A', "baz")
   *         .buildOrThrow();
   * }
   *
   * <p>By default, the order in which cells are added to the builder determines the iteration
   * ordering of all views in the returned table, with {@link #putAll} following the {@link
   * Table#cellSet()} iteration order. However, if {@link #orderRowsBy} or {@link #orderColumnsBy}
   * is called, the views are sorted by the supplied comparators.
   *

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A utility for testing an Iterator implementation by comparing its behavior to that of a "known
 * good" reference implementation. In order to accomplish this, it's important to test a great
 * variety of sequences of the {@link Iterator#next}, {@link Iterator#hasNext} and {@link
 * Iterator#remove} operations. This utility takes the brute-force approach of trying <i>all</i>

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>

   * Multimap#asMap()} will iterate through the keys in the order that they were first added to the
   * multimap, save that if all values associated with a key are removed and then the key is added
   * back into the multimap, that key will come last in the key iteration order.
   */
  public static MultimapBuilderWithKeys<@Nullable Object> linkedHashKeys() {

	tx.Statement.AddClause(clause.GroupBy{
		Having: tx.Statement.BuildCondition(query, args...),
	})
	return
}

// Order specify order when retrieving records from database
//
//	db.Order("name DESC")
//	db.Order(clause.OrderByColumn{Column: clause.Column{Name: "name"}, Desc: true})
//	db.Order(clause.OrderBy{Columns: []clause.OrderByColumn{
//		{Column: clause.Column{Name: "name"}, Desc: true},

	// find
	sql := DB.ToSQL(func(tx *gorm.DB) *gorm.DB {
		return tx.Model(&User{}).Where("id = ?", 100).Limit(10).Order("age desc").Find(&[]User{})
	})
	assertEqualSQL(t, `SELECT * FROM "users" WHERE id = 100 AND "users"."deleted_at" IS NULL ORDER BY age desc LIMIT 10`, sql)

	// after model changed
	if DB.Statement.DryRun || DB.DryRun {