d.deleteRecursive(candidate)
		d.replaceHashed(candidate, nil, *flat)

		// Remove top entry and subtract removed children.
		remove -= removing
		leaves = leaves[1:]
	}
}

// forceCompact will force compact the cache of the top entry.
// If the number of children is more than limit*100, it will compact self.
// When above the limit a cleanup will also be performed to remove any possible abandoned entries.

            return OptionalThing.empty();
        }
        return OptionalThing.of(pipeline);
    }

    /**
     * Refreshes the crawling configuration cache by invalidating all cached entries.
     * This forces the next access to reload configurations from the underlying services.
     */
    public void refresh() {
        crawlingConfigCache.invalidateAll();
    }

    /**

{* ../../docs_src/query_params_str_validations/tutorial006_an_py39.py hl[9] *}

### Required, can be `None` { #required-can-be-none }

You can declare that a parameter can accept `None`, but that it's still required. This would force clients to send a value, even if the value is `None`.

To do that, you can declare that `None` is a valid type but simply do not declare a default value:

        group = ciGroup
    }

    register("forceRealizeDependencyManagementTest") {
        description = "Runs all integration tests with the dependency management engine in 'force component realization' mode"
        group = ciGroup
    }
}

// https://github.com/gradle/gradle-private/issues/3380
fun Test.configureAndroidUserHome() {

C'est pourquoi il est logique d'utiliser du code asynchrone ⏸🔀⏯ pour des APIs web.

Ce type d'asynchronicité est ce qui a rendu NodeJS populaire (bien que NodeJS ne soit pas parallèle) et c'est la force du Go en tant que langage de programmation.

Et c'est le même niveau de performance que celui obtenu avec **FastAPI**.

   * one from the pool. We must take the pooled connection because by taking it from the pool, we've
   * fully acquired it.
   *
   * This test yields threads to force the decision of plan1 to be deliberate and not lucky. In
   * particular, we set up this sequence of events:
   *
   *  1. take plan 0
   *  3. plan 0 connects
   *  4. finish taking plan 1
   *

            assertFalse(testBlock.isUseUnicode());
            testBlock.setUseUnicode(true);
            assertTrue(testBlock.isUseUnicode());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Test force unicode property")
        void testForceUnicodeProperty() {
            assertFalse(testBlock.isForceUnicode());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Test extended security property")

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code long[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).
 *   <li>Can't be passed directly to methods that expect {@code long[]} (though the most common
 *       utilities do have replacements here).

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).
 *   <li>Can't be passed directly to methods that expect {@code int[]} (though the most common
 *       utilities do have replacements here).

        options.color().ifPresent(color -> {
            String c = color.toLowerCase(Locale.ENGLISH);
            if (!Arrays.asList("always", "yes", "force", "never", "no", "none", "auto", "tty", "if-tty")
                    .contains(c)) {
                context.parsingFailed = true;
                context.parserRequest
                        .logger()