*      file operations.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>The jCIFS API maps all of these operations into the standard Java
 * <code>XxxputStream</code> interface. A special <code>PIPE_TYPE</code>
 * flags is necessary to distinguish which type of Named Pipe behavior
 * is desired.
 *
 * <p><table border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
 * <tr bgcolor="#ccccff">

        qos.impersonation_level = 2;
        qos.context_mode = 1;
        qos.effective_only = 0;
        this.object_attributes.security_quality_of_service = qos;
        this.ptype = 0;
        this.flags = DCERPC_FIRST_FRAG | DCERPC_LAST_FRAG;
    }

            this.remark = info1.remark;
        }
    }


    public MsrpcShareEnum ( String server ) {
        super("\\\\" + server, 1, new srvsvc.ShareInfoCtr1(), -1, 0, 0);
        this.ptype = 0;
        this.flags = DCERPC_FIRST_FRAG | DCERPC_LAST_FRAG;
    }


    public FileEntry[] getEntries () {
        /*
         * The ShareInfo1 class does not implement the FileEntry

            this.remark = info1.remark;
        }
    }

    public MsrpcShareEnum(String server) {
        super("\\\\" + server, 1, new srvsvc.ShareInfoCtr1(), -1, 0, 0);
        ptype = 0;
        flags = DCERPC_FIRST_FRAG | DCERPC_LAST_FRAG;
    }

    public FileEntry[] getEntries() {
        /* The ShareInfo1 class does not implement the FileEntry
         * interface (because it is generated from IDL). Therefore

        (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, // Command
        (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, // CreditRequest/CreditResponse
        (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, // Flags
        (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, // NextCommand
        (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, (byte) 0x00, // MessageId

    * Aber es bietet Ihnen die Tools zum Erstellen einfacher Webanwendungen, mit Routing basierend auf Pfaden, usw.
    * Wenn Sie Starlette vergleichen, vergleichen Sie es mit Webframeworks (oder Mikroframeworks) wie Sanic, Flask, Django, usw.
* **FastAPI**:
    * So wie Starlette Uvicorn verwendet und nicht schneller als dieses sein kann, verwendet **FastAPI** Starlette, sodass es nicht schneller als dieses sein kann.

public class MsrpcShareGetInfo extends srvsvc.ShareGetInfo {

    public MsrpcShareGetInfo ( String server, String sharename ) {
        super(server, sharename, 502, new srvsvc.ShareInfo502());
        this.ptype = 0;
        this.flags = DCERPC_FIRST_FRAG | DCERPC_LAST_FRAG;
    }


    public ACE[] getSecurity () throws IOException {
        srvsvc.ShareInfo502 info502 = (srvsvc.ShareInfo502) this.info;

// along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

package cmd

import "time"

const (
	peerRESTVersion       = "v39" // add more flags to speedtest API
	peerRESTVersionPrefix = SlashSeparator + peerRESTVersion
	peerRESTPrefix        = minioReservedBucketPath + "/peer"
	peerRESTPath          = peerRESTPrefix + peerRESTVersionPrefix
)

const (

    /**
     * @param selectedMech
     * @return whether the specified mechanism is preferred
     */
    boolean isPreferredMech ( ASN1ObjectIdentifier selectedMech );


    /**
     * @return context flags
     */
    int getFlags ();


    /**
     * @return array of supported mechanism OIDs
     */
    ASN1ObjectIdentifier[] getSupportedMechs ();


    /**
     * 

    * FastAPI를 사용하지 않고 직접 Starlette(또는 Sanic, Flask, Responder 등)를 사용했다면 데이터 검증 및 직렬화를 직접 구현해야 합니다. 따라서 최종 응용 프로그램은 FastAPI를 사용한 것과 동일한 오버헤드를 가지게 될 것입니다. 많은 경우 데이터 검증 및 직렬화가 응용 프로그램에서 작성된 코드 중 가장 많은 부분을 차지합니다.
    * 따라서 FastAPI를 사용함으로써 개발 시간, 버그, 코드 라인을 줄일 수 있으며, FastAPI를 사용하지 않았을 때와 동일하거나 더 나은 성능을 얻을 수 있습니다(코드에서 모두 구현해야 하기 때문에).