when (branchName) {
                MASTER_BRANCH -> 0
                RELEASE_BRANCH -> 1
                else -> {
                    val matchResult = OLD_RELEASE_PATTERN.find(branchName)
                    if (matchResult == null) {
                        null
                    } else {
                        (matchResult.groupValues[1].toInt() - 4).apply {

	GOOS=android \
	GOARCH=arm64 \
	CC_FOR_TARGET=$NDK/toolchains/llvm/prebuilt/linux-x86_64/bin/aarch64-linux-android21-clang \
	./all.bash

To run tests on the Android device, add the bin directory to PATH so the
go tool can find the go_android_$GOARCH_exec wrapper generated by
make.bash. For example, to run the go1 benchmarks

	export PATH=$GOROOT/bin:$PATH
	cd $GOROOT/test/bench/go1/

from tensorflow.python.compat import v2_compat as _compat
_compat.enable_v2_behavior()
_major_api_version = 2


# Load all plugin libraries from site-packages/tensorflow-plugins if we are
# running under pip.
# TODO(gunan): Find a better location for this code snippet.
from tensorflow.python.framework import load_library as _ll
from tensorflow.python.lib.io import file_io as _fi

# Get sitepackages directories for the python installation.

echo Please set the JAVA_HOME variable in your environment to match the >&2
echo location of your Java installation. >&2
echo.
goto error

@REM ==== END VALIDATION ====

:init

@REM Find the project base dir, i.e. the directory that contains the folder ".mvn".
@REM Fallback to current working directory if not found.

set MAVEN_PROJECTBASEDIR=%MAVEN_BASEDIR%
IF NOT "%MAVEN_PROJECTBASEDIR%"=="" goto endDetectBaseDir

parsing these is significantly less work and more robust than parsing
C source.

Cgo first invokes gcc -E -dM on the preamble, in order to find out
about simple #defines for constants and the like. These are recorded
for later use.

Next, cgo needs to identify the kinds for each identifier. For the
identifiers C.foo, cgo generates this C program:

	<preamble>
	#line 1 "not-declared"

## Public Discussions

Please restrain from publicly discussing a potential security vulnerability. 🙊

It's better to discuss privately and try to find a solution first, to limit the potential impact as much as possible.

---

Thanks for your help!

  CONNECT_ERROR(0xa),

  ENHANCE_YOUR_CALM(0xb),

  INADEQUATE_SECURITY(0xc),

  HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED(0xd),
  ;

  companion object {
    fun fromHttp2(code: Int): ErrorCode? = values().find { it.httpCode == code }
  }

          List<? extends E> list,
          int foundIndex) {
        // Of course, we have to use binary search to find the precise
        // breakpoint...
        int lower = 0;
        int upper = foundIndex;
        // Of course, we have to use binary search to find the precise breakpoint...
        // Everything between lower and upper inclusive compares at <= 0.
        while (lower < upper) {

@Tag("Slow")
class AllMainsTest {
  @ParameterizedTest
  @ArgumentsSource(MainTestProvider::class)
  fun runMain(className: String) {
    val mainMethod =
      Class
        .forName(className)
        .methods
        .find { it.name == "main" }
    try {
      if (mainMethod != null) {
        if (mainMethod.parameters.isEmpty()) {
          mainMethod.invoke(null)
        } else {
          mainMethod.invoke(null, arrayOf<String>())

function prepare_block_devices() {
	set -e
	mkdir -p ${WORK_DIR}/disks/ ${WORK_DIR}/mnt/
	sudo modprobe loop
	for i in 1 2 3 4; do
		dd if=/dev/zero of=${WORK_DIR}/disks/img.${i} bs=1M count=2000
		device=$(sudo losetup --find --show ${WORK_DIR}/disks/img.${i})
		sudo mkfs.ext4 -F ${device}
		mkdir -p ${WORK_DIR}/mnt/disk${i}/
		sudo mount ${device} ${WORK_DIR}/mnt/disk${i}/
		sudo chown "$(id -u):$(id -g)" ${device} ${WORK_DIR}/mnt/disk${i}/
	done