*
   * <p>Because a {@code SetMultimap} has unique values for a given key, this method returns a
   * {@link Set}, instead of the {@link Collection} specified in the {@link Multimap} interface.
   *
   * <p>Any duplicates in {@code values} will be stored in the multimap once.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  public Set<V> replaceValues(@ParametricNullness K key, Iterable<? extends V> values) {

		var res *Checksum
		for _, header := range trailing {
			var duplicates bool
			for _, t := range BaseChecksumTypes {
				if strings.EqualFold(t.Key(), header) {
					duplicates = res != nil
					res = NewChecksumWithType(t|ChecksumTrailing, "")
				}
			}
			if duplicates {
				return nil, ErrInvalidChecksum
			}
		}
		if res != nil {

    testers.add(SetHashCodeTester.class);
    testers.add(SetEqualsTester.class);
    testers.add(SetRemoveTester.class);
    // SetRemoveAllTester doesn't exist because, Sets not permitting
    // duplicate elements, there are no tests for Set.removeAll() that aren't
    // covered by CollectionRemoveAllTester.
    return testers;
  }

  @Override
  protected List<TestSuite> createDerivedSuites(

                                <c:if test="${editable}"><la:link styleClass="btn btn-info"
                                                                  href="/admin/dataconfig/duplicate/${f:u(id)}">
                                    <i class="fa fa-copy" aria-hidden="true"></i>
                                    <la:message key="labels.crud_button_duplicate"/>
                                </la:link></c:if>

 * to implement the related methods as well. Finally, two collection views are provided: {@link
 * #elementSet} contains the distinct elements of the multiset "with duplicates collapsed", and
 * {@link #entrySet} is similar but contains {@link Entry Multiset.Entry} instances, each providing
 * both a distinct element and the count of that element.
 *

    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this
    // one. (StringCoding$StringDecoder vs. StreamDecoder).  StringCoding has a ton of special cases
    // theoretically we could duplicate all that logic here to try to beat 'new String' or at least
    // come close.
    USING_DECODER_WITH_SIZE_HINT {
      @Override
      String read(ByteSource byteSource, Charset cs) throws IOException {

    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this
    // one. (StringCoding$StringDecoder vs. StreamDecoder).  StringCoding has a ton of special cases
    // theoretically we could duplicate all that logic here to try to beat 'new String' or at least
    // come close.
    USING_DECODER_WITH_SIZE_HINT {
      @Override
      String read(ByteSource byteSource, Charset cs) throws IOException {

{* ../../docs_src/header_params/tutorial002_an_py310.py hl[10] *}

/// warning | 경고

`convert_underscores`를 `False`로 설정하기 전에, 어떤 HTTP 프록시들과 서버들은 언더스코어가 포함된 헤더 사용을 허락하지 않는다는 것을 명심하십시오.

///

## 중복 헤더 { #duplicate-headers }

중복 헤더들을 수신할 수 있습니다. 즉, 다중값을 갖는 동일한 헤더를 뜻합니다.

타입 정의에서 리스트를 사용하여 이러한 케이스를 정의할 수 있습니다.

중복 헤더의 모든 값을 파이썬 `list`로 수신합니다.

예를 들어, 두 번 이상 나타날 수 있는 `X-Token`헤더를 선언하려면, 다음과 같이 작성합니다:

    //
    // 8) Create ReactorReader with the getProjectMap( projects ). NOTE that getProjectMap(projects) is the code that
    // checks for duplicate projects definitions in the build. Ideally this type of duplicate checking should be
    // part of getting the reactor projects in 6). The duplicate checking is conflated with getProjectMap(projects).
    //
    // 9) Execute AbstractLifecycleParticipant.afterProjectsRead(session)
    //

                <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0">
                    <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
                    <groupId>com.example</groupId>
                    <artifactId>duplicate-project</artifactId>
                    <version>1.0.0</version>
                </project>
                """;

            Document doc1 = Document.of(pomXml);
            Document doc2 = Document.of(pomXml);