They are more relevant for older versions, before OpenAPI 3.1.0 was available.

You can consider this a brief OpenAPI and JSON Schema **history lesson**. 🤓

///

/// warning

These are very technical details about the standards **JSON Schema** and **OpenAPI**.

If the ideas above already work for you, that might be enough, and you probably don't need these details, feel free to skip them.

///

        if (thrown == suppressed) {
          return;
        }
        try {
          thrown.addSuppressed(suppressed);
        } catch (Throwable e) {
          /*
           * A Throwable is very unlikely, but we really don't want to throw from a Suppressor, so
           * we catch everything. (Any Exception is either a RuntimeException or

 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *
 * <p>Failure of the expected event to occur within an implementation-defined "reasonable" time
 * period or an interrupt while waiting for the expected event will result in a {@link

 * they end up depending on <i>other</i> existing poor-quality {@code hashCode} implementations,
 * including those in many JDK classes.
 *
 * <p>{@code Object.hashCode} implementations tend to be very fast, but have weak collision
 * prevention and <i>no</i> expectation of bit dispersion. This leaves them perfectly suitable for
 * use in hash tables, because extra collisions cause only a slight performance hit, while poor bit

 * they end up depending on <i>other</i> existing poor-quality {@code hashCode} implementations,
 * including those in many JDK classes.
 *
 * <p>{@code Object.hashCode} implementations tend to be very fast, but have weak collision
 * prevention and <i>no</i> expectation of bit dispersion. This leaves them perfectly suitable for
 * use in hash tables, because extra collisions cause only a slight performance hit, while poor bit

}

# This test ensures that all the targets built into the Python package include
# their dependencies. It's a rewritten version of the "smoke test", an older
# Python script that was very difficult to understand. See
# https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/tensorflow/tools/pip_package/pip_smoke_test.py
@test "Pip package includes all required //tensorflow dependencies" {

        long end = System.nanoTime();
        double totalTimeMs = (end - start) / 1_000_000.0;

        System.out.printf("Overall Performance Test: completed in %.2f ms%n", totalTimeMs);

        // Should complete very quickly with all optimizations
        assertTrue(totalTimeMs < 100, "All operations should complete quickly with performance fixes");

        pool.close();
    }

{* ../../docs_src/handling_errors/tutorial006_py39.py hl[2:5,15,21] *}

 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *
 * <p>Failure of the expected event to occur within an implementation-defined "reasonable" time
 * period or an interrupt while waiting for the expected event will result in a {@link

---

FastAPI is a modern, fast (high-performance), web framework for building APIs with Python based on standard Python type hints.

The key features are:

* **Fast**: Very high performance, on par with **NodeJS** and **Go** (thanks to Starlette and Pydantic). [One of the fastest Python frameworks available](#performance).
* **Fast to code**: Increase the speed to develop features by about 200% to 300%. *