import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Basher test for {@link ConcurrentHashMultiset}: start a bunch of threads, have each of them do
 * operations at random. Each thread keeps track of the per-key deltas that it's directly
 * responsible for; after all threads have completed, we sum the per-key deltas and compare to the
 * existing multiset values.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */

     * Don't bother testing. All non-primitive parameters are used only to construct error messages.
     * We never want to pass null for them, so we haven't annotated them to say that null is
     * allowed. But at the same time, it seems wasteful to bother inserting the checkNotNull calls
     * that NullPointerTester wants.
     *
     * (This empty method disables the automatic null testing provided by PackageSanityTests.)
     */
  }

       changes with every test execution, such that running the test
       actually changes the test classpath itself. This means that it
       can"t benefit from incremental build acceleration, because on every
       execution it sees that the classpath has changed, and so to be
       safe, it needs to re-run.

       - This is unfortunate, because actually it would be safe to declare
       the task as up-to-date, because these two files, which are based on

          sb.append(DELIMITER_STRING);
        }
        sb.append(comp);
      }
      dummy ^= sb.toString().length();
    }
    return dummy;
  }

  /**
   * Similar to the above, but keeps a boolean flag rather than checking for the string accumulated
   * so far being empty. As a result, it does not have the above-mentioned bug.
   */
  @Benchmark
  int booleanIfFirst(int reps) {
    int dummy = 0;

   * created arrays to have a {@code @Nullable} element type even when they're created directly with
   * {@code new ImmutableMapEntry[...]}, so it seems silly to insist on that only here.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // Safe as long as the javadocs are followed
  static <K, V> ImmutableMapEntry<K, V>[] createEntryArray(int size) {

						<goals>
							<goal>check</goal>
						</goals>
					</execution>
				</executions>
				<configuration>
					<failOnError>false</failOnError>
					<ignored>
						<difference>
							<!-- seems to be a clirr bug that it cannot handle the different inherited 
								return types -->
							<className>**</className>
							<differenceType>7006</differenceType>
							<method>*</method>
							<from>*</from>

Upgrading to OkHttp 4
=====================

OkHttp 4.x upgrades our implementation language from Java to Kotlin and keeps everything else the
same. We’ve chosen Kotlin because it gives us powerful new capabilities while integrating closely
with Java.

We spent a lot of time and energy on retaining strict compatibility with OkHttp 3.x. We’re even
keeping the package name the same: `okhttp3`!

There are three kinds of compatibility we’re tracking:

 * continues. See {@link QueueWorker#workOnQueue} for details.
 *
 * <p>{@code RuntimeException}s thrown by tasks are simply logged and the executor keeps trucking.
 * If an {@code Error} is thrown, the error will propagate and execution will stop until it is
 * restarted by a call to {@link #execute}.
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible

    // parseable, but the spec doesn't seem to say which exception is thrown for an invalid radix.
    // In contrast to the JVM, Kotlin native throws an Illegal argument exception in this case
    // (which seems to make more sense).
    try {
      UnsignedInts.parseUnsignedInt("0", Character.MIN_RADIX - 1);
      fail();
    } catch (NumberFormatException expected) {
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {

      /*
       * I assume that this check can't fail because JELLY_BEAN will be present only if we're
       * running under Jelly Bean or higher. But it seems safest to check.
       */
      if (version < jellyBean) {
        return new ThrowingCreator();
      }
    } catch (ReflectiveOperationException e) {