```
Client #1596980209979 left the chat
```

/// tip

The app above is a minimal and simple example to demonstrate how to handle and broadcast messages to several WebSocket connections.

But keep in mind that, as everything is handled in memory, in a single list, it will only work while the process is running, and will only work with a single process.

## Attribution

	}

	// Bucket metrics are special, they always include the bucket label. These
	// metrics required a list of buckets to be passed to the loader, and the list
	// of buckets is not known until the request is made. So we keep a separate
	// map for bucket metrics and handle them specially.

	// Add the serverName and poolIndex labels to all non-cluster metrics.
	//
	// Also create metric group maps and set the cache.

 * }
 *
 * <p>Even if your non-test code does not use finalization, you can use this class to test for
 * leaks, by ensuring that objects are no longer strongly referenced:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * // Helper function keeps victim stack-unreachable.
 * private WeakReference<Foo> fooWeakRef() {
 *   Foo x = ....;
 *   WeakReference<Foo> weakRef = new WeakReference<>(x);
 *   // ... use x ...

   */
  private static long fullFingerprint(byte[] bytes, int offset, int length) {
    // For lengths over 64 bytes we hash the end first, and then as we
    // loop we keep 56 bytes of state: v, w, x, y, and z.
    long x = load64(bytes, offset);
    long y = load64(bytes, offset + length - 16) ^ K1;
    long z = load64(bytes, offset + length - 56) ^ K0;
    long[] v = new long[2];

  }

  /**
   * Regression test for an edge case where closing response body in the HTTP engine doesn't release
   * the corresponding stream allocation. This test keeps those response bodies alive and reads
   * them after the redirect has completed. This forces a connection to not be reused where it would
   * be otherwise.
   *
   *

         * than a handful of exceptions. But it seems prudent to set a cap on how many we'll cache.
         * This avoids out-of-control memory consumption, and it keeps the cache from growing so
         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope

   *       assign all the old {@code alpha} traffic to {@code bravo} and all the old {@code bravo}
   *       traffic to {@code charlie}, rather than letting {@code bravo} keep its traffic.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>See the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_hashing">Wikipedia article on
   * consistent hashing</a> for more information.
   */

	// return 503 server closed error, consider it as an offline node
	case strings.Contains(err.Error(), http.ErrServerClosed.Error()):
		return true
	// Corner case, the server closed the connection with a keep-alive timeout
	// some requests are not retried internally, such as POST request with written body
	case strings.Contains(err.Error(), "server closed idle connection"):
		return true
	}

	return false
}

         * than a handful of exceptions. But it seems prudent to set a cap on how many we'll cache.
         * This avoids out-of-control memory consumption, and it keeps the cache from growing so
         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope