return ImmutableSortedSet.orderedBy(STRING_REVERSED).add(elements).build();
    }

    /*
     * While the current implementation returns `this`, that's not something we mean to guarantee.
     * Callers of TestContainerGenerator.order need to be prepared for implementations to return a new
     * collection.
     */
    @SuppressWarnings("CanIgnoreReturnValueSuggester")
    @Override

   * Creates a {@code HashMap} instance, with a high enough "initial capacity" that it <i>should</i>
   * hold {@code expectedSize} elements without growth. This behavior cannot be broadly guaranteed,
   * but it is observed to be true for OpenJDK 1.7. It also can't be guaranteed that the method
   * isn't inadvertently <i>oversizing</i> the returned map.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of entries you expect to add to the returned map

   * Creates a {@code HashMap} instance, with a high enough "initial capacity" that it <i>should</i>
   * hold {@code expectedSize} elements without growth. This behavior cannot be broadly guaranteed,
   * but it is observed to be true for OpenJDK 1.7. It also can't be guaranteed that the method
   * isn't inadvertently <i>oversizing</i> the returned map.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of entries you expect to add to the returned map

 * result, if the comparator is not consistent with equals, some of the standard implementations may
 * violate the {@code Set} contract.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and the collection views they return are not guaranteed to be
 * thread-safe, even when all of the methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Mike Bostock
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
/*

        if (sneaky == null) {
          return sample;
        } else {
          /* Someone beat us to it! Trying again...
           *
           * Technically this loop not guaranteed to terminate, so theoretically (extremely
           * unlikely) this thread might starve, but even then, there is always going to be another
           * thread doing progress here.
           */
        }
      }

   * specified in {@link #hash}.
   *
   * <p>This method should not be called except by {@link #hash}. When {@link #hash} calls this
   * method, {@code t} is guaranteed to be non-null.
   *
   * @since 10.0 (previously, subclasses would override hash())
   */
  @ForOverride
  protected abstract int doHash(T t);

  /**

   * example during quiescent points between multithreaded computations. If there are updates
   * concurrent with this method, the returned value is not guaranteed to be the final
   * value occurring before the reset.
   *
   * @return the sum
   */
  public long sumThenReset() {
    long sum = base;
    Cell[] as = cells;
    base = 0L;
    if (as != null) {

 *   <li>does not allow self-loops
 *   <li>orders {@link ValueGraph#nodes()} in the order in which the elements were added (insertion
 *       order)
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>{@code ValueGraph}s built by this class also guarantee that each collection-returning accessor
 * returns a <b>(live) unmodifiable view</b>; see <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/GraphsExplained#accessor-behavior">the external
 * documentation</a> for details.
 *

 * invoke methods, they invoke methods on the {@code ForwardingSortedMultiset}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and any collection views they return are not guaranteed to be
 * thread-safe, even when all of the methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 15.0
 */
@GwtCompatible

      /*
       * If another handleException() caller created the set, we need to use that copy in case yet
       * other callers have added to it.
       *
       * This read is guaranteed to get us the right value because we only set this once (here).
       *
       * requireNonNull is safe because either our compareAndSet succeeded or it failed because
       * another thread did it for us.
       */