Además, creamos un `secret_name` para el héroe, pero hasta ahora, lo estamos devolviendo en todas partes, eso no es muy **secreto**... 😅

Arreglaremos estas cosas añadiendo unos **modelos extra**. Aquí es donde SQLModel brillará. ✨

### Crear Múltiples Modelos

En **SQLModel**, cualquier clase de modelo que tenga `table=True` es un **modelo de tabla**.

   * input byte array {@code {0x54, 0x32}} would yield the {@code char} value {@code '\\u5432'}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 2 elements
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // doesn't work
  public static char fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

   * input byte array {@code {0x54, 0x32}} would yield the {@code short} value {@code 0x5432}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 2 elements
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // doesn't work
  public static short fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

   * input byte array {@code {0x54, 0x32}} would yield the {@code short} value {@code 0x5432}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 2 elements
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // doesn't work
  public static short fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

 *
 * <p>The extra bookkeeping done by cycle detecting locks comes at some cost to performance.
 * Benchmarks (as of December 2011) show that:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>for an unnested {@code lock()} and {@code unlock()}, a cycle detecting lock takes 38ns as
 *       opposed to the 24ns taken by a plain lock.
 *   <li>for nested locking, the cost increases with the depth of the nesting:
 *       <ul>

<div style="text-align: right; margin-right: 10%;">Deon Pillsbury - <strong>Cisco</strong> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/deonpillsbury_cisco-cx-python-activity-6963242628536487936-trAp/" target="_blank"><small>(ref)</small></a></div>

---

## **Typer**, a CLI-ok FastAPI-ja

## Changelog since v1.32.2

## Changes by Kind

### API Change

- DRA: CEL expressions using attribute strings exceeded the cost limit because their cost estimation was incomplete. Cost estimation was unnecessarily also computed in the scheduler. ([#129690](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/129690), [@pohly](https://github.com/pohly)) [SIG Node]

### Bug or Regression

<div style="text-align: right; margin-right: 10%;">Deon Pillsbury - <strong>Cisco</strong> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/deonpillsbury_cisco-cx-python-activity-6963242628536487936-trAp/" target="_blank"><small>(ref)</small></a></div>

---

## **Typer**, CLI FastAPI

<div style="text-align: right; margin-right: 10%;">Deon Pillsbury - <strong>Cisco</strong> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/deonpillsbury_cisco-cx-python-activity-6963242628536487936-trAp/" target="_blank"><small>(ref)</small></a></div>

---

## **Typer**, CLI-ların FastAPI-ı

<div style="text-align: right; margin-right: 10%;">Deon Pillsbury - <strong>Cisco</strong> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/deonpillsbury_cisco-cx-python-activity-6963242628536487936-trAp/" target="_blank"><small>(Ref)</small></a></div>

---

## **Typer**, das FastAPI der CLIs