* elements, if there is no comparator) to test element equality. As a result, if the comparator is
 * not consistent with equals, some of the standard implementations may violate the {@code Map}
 * contract.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and the collection views they return are not guaranteed to be
 * thread-safe, even when all of the methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman

import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.entity.ResponseData;
import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.processor.ResponseProcessor;
import org.dbflute.utflute.core.PlainTestCase;

/**
 * Test class for Rule interface.
 * Tests the contract and behavior of Rule implementations.
 */
public class RuleTest extends PlainTestCase {

    /**
     * Test implementation of Rule interface for testing purposes
     */

          // Checking subtype between declared and actual type bounds
          // adds recursive isSubtypeOf() call and feels complicated.
          // There is no contract one way or another as long as isSubtypeOf() works as expected.
          combined.addAll(asList(typeParam.getBounds()));
          if (combined.size() > 1) { // Object is implicit and only useful if it's the only bound.

        // This cast is not itself safe, but the following statement
        // will fail if the runtime type of items[i] is not assignable
        // to the runtime type of a[k++], which is all that the method
        // contract requires (see @throws ArrayStoreException above).
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
        T t = (T) items[i];
        a[k++] = t;
        i = inc(i);
      }
      if (a.length > count) a[count] = null;

CONTRIBUTORS SHALL HAVE ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION
LOST PROFITS), HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT,
STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY
WAY OUT OF THE USE OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROGRAM OR THE EXERCISE OF ANY RIGHTS
GRANTED HEREUNDER, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

    Collections.shuffle(hashCodes);
    HashCode hashCode2 = Hashing.combineUnordered(hashCodes);

    assertEquals(hashCode1, hashCode2);
  }

  // This isn't specified by contract, but it'll still be nice to know if this behavior changes.
  public void testConcatenating_equals() {
    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(Hashing.concatenating(asList(Hashing.md5())))

import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.entity.ResultData;
import org.codelibs.fess.crawler.exception.CrawlerSystemException;
import org.dbflute.utflute.core.PlainTestCase;

/**
 * Test class for Transformer interface.
 * Tests the contract and behavior of Transformer implementations.
 */
public class TransformerTest extends PlainTestCase {

    /**
     * Basic test implementation of Transformer
     */

      return (Spliterator<T>) iterable.spliterator();
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return iterable.toString();
    }
    // no equals and hashCode; it would break the contract!
  }

  /** Returns the number of elements in {@code iterable}. */
  public static int size(Iterable<?> iterable) {
    return (iterable instanceof Collection)
        ? ((Collection<?>) iterable).size()

        return method.invoke(obj, args);
    }

    /**
     * Tests for the TreeConnectResponse interface using a mock implementation
     */
    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Interface Contract Tests")
    class InterfaceTests {

        private TreeConnectResponse mockResponse;

        @BeforeEach
        void setUp() {
            mockResponse = mock(TreeConnectResponse.class);
        }

          // Checking subtype between declared and actual type bounds
          // adds recursive isSubtypeOf() call and feels complicated.
          // There is no contract one way or another as long as isSubtypeOf() works as expected.
          combined.addAll(asList(typeParam.getBounds()));
          if (combined.size() > 1) { // Object is implicit and only useful if it's the only bound.