objectAPI, _ := validateAdminReq(ctx, w, r, policy.RebalanceAdminAction)
	if objectAPI == nil {
		return
	}

	// Proxy rebalance-status to first pool first node, so that users see a
	// consistent view of rebalance progress even though different rebalancing
	// pools may temporarily have out of date info on the others.
	if ep := globalEndpoints[0].Endpoints[0]; !ep.IsLocal {

        assertTrue(zebra.compareTo(greek) < 0);
    }

    /**
     * Test <a href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5568">MNG-5568</a> edge case
     * which was showing transitive inconsistency: since A &gt; B and B &gt; C then we should have A &gt; C
     * otherwise sorting a list of ComparableVersions() will in some cases throw runtime exception;

  reached or started.

  All of these operations will produce their own unique errors in the absence of
  a coordinated offline strategy. In addition, efforts to unite these failing
  behaviors behind a consistent user interface is much, much more difficult if
  the system can't tell whether it has access to the network required by these
  operations.

  Offline mode really means anticipating a lack of network connectivity, and as

     * duplication of properties (multiple name/value pairs with the same name can be added).
     */
    @Override
    public String toString() {
      // create a copy to keep it consistent in case value changes
      boolean omitNullValuesSnapshot = omitNullValues;
      boolean omitEmptyValuesSnapshot = omitEmptyValues;
      String nextSeparator = "";

or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer, and charge a fee for, 
acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity, or other liability obligations 
and/or rights consistent with this License. However, in accepting such 
obligations, You may act only on Your own behalf and on Your sole 
responsibility, not on behalf of any other Contributor, and only if You 

   * example, {@code [] < [1] < [1, 2] < [2] < [1 << 31]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(int[], int[])}.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 9+ users:</b> Use {@link Arrays#compareUnsigned(int[], int[])
   * Arrays::compareUnsigned}.
   */

  }

  // TODO(b/172823566): Use mainline testToImmutableSortedSet once CollectorTester is usable.
  public void testToImmutableSortedSet_java7() {
    // Note that a Collector should generally enforce consistent comparator between builders
    ImmutableSortedSet.Builder<String> zis =
        ImmutableSortedSet.<String>naturalOrder().add("c", "b", "c");
    ImmutableSortedSet.Builder<String> zat =

	idx := 0
	for {
		mapID := formatUUID(args.UID, idx)
		resource, ok := l.lockUID[mapID]
		if !ok {
			return idx > 0, nil
		}
		lris, ok := l.lockMap[resource]
		if !ok {
			// Unexpected  inconsistency, delete.
			delete(l.lockUID, mapID)
			idx++
			continue
		}
		reply = true
		l.removeEntry(resource, dsync.LockArgs{UID: args.UID}, &lris)
		idx++
	}
}

 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods uses the map's comparator (or the natural ordering of the
 * elements, if there is no comparator) to test element equality. As a result, if the comparator is
 * not consistent with equals, some of the standard implementations may violate the {@code Map}
 * contract.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and the collection views they return are not guaranteed to be

 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods uses the map's comparator (or the natural ordering of the
 * elements, if there is no comparator) to test element equality. As a result, if the comparator is
 * not consistent with equals, some of the standard implementations may violate the {@code Map}
 * contract.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and the collection views they return are not guaranteed to be