boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
      replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
      the brackets!)  The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
      comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
      file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
      same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier

 * </ul>
 *
 * <h3>Format Preservation</h3>
 * <ul>
 *   <li><strong>Whitespace Preservation</strong>: Maintains original formatting when removing elements</li>
 *   <li><strong>Comment Preservation</strong>: Preserves XML comments and processing instructions</li>
 *   <li><strong>Line Separator Handling</strong>: Uses system-appropriate line separators</li>
 * </ul>
 */

  @GwtIncompatible // SerializableTester
  public void testIsEqualToNull_serialization() {
    checkSerialization(Predicates.equalTo(null));
  }

  /**
   * Tests for Predicates.instanceOf(x). TODO: Fix the comment style after fixing annotation
   * stripper to remove comments properly. Currently, all tests before the comments are removed as
   * well.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // Predicates.instanceOf

 * requirement that existing callers already fulfill).
 *
 * Disclaimer: Part of the reason that callers are so well adapted to `Function<A, B>` may be that
 * that is how the signature looked even prior to this comment! So naturally any change can break
 * existing users, but it can't *fix* existing users because any users who needed
 * `Function<@Nullable A, @Nullable B>` already had to find a workaround. Still, there is a *ton* of

      this.right = null;
    }

    /** Constructor for the header node. */
    AvlNode() {
      this.elem = null;
      this.elemCount = 1;
    }

    // For discussion of pred() and succ(), see the comment on the pred and succ fields.

    private AvlNode<E> pred() {
      return requireNonNull(pred);
    }

    private AvlNode<E> succ() {
      return requireNonNull(succ);
    }

      boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
      replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
      the brackets!)  The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
      comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
      file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
      same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier

        if (SO_TIMEOUT != 0) {
            closeTimeout = Math.max(SO_TIMEOUT, timeout);
        }
        // If socket is still good, the new closeTimeout will
        // be ignored; see tryClose comment.
        if (socket == null) {
            socket = new DatagramSocket(lport, laddr);
            thread = new Thread(this, "JCIFS-NameServiceClient");
            thread.setDaemon(true);
            thread.start();

* If you see the PR makes sense, or we discussed it and considered it should be accepted, you can add commits on top of the PR to tweak it, to add docs, tests, format, refactor, remove extra files, etc.
* Feel free to comment in the PR to ask for more information, to suggest changes, etc.
* Once you think the PR is ready, move it in the internal GitHub project for me to review it.

## FastAPI People PRs

            assertFalse((executeMask & ACE.FILE_WRITE_DATA) != 0, "Execute should not include write access");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should validate documented bit comment consistency")
        void shouldValidateDocumentedBitComments() {
            // Verify that comments in source match actual constant values (not bit positions)

    /*
     * If greatestOf() promised to be implemented as reverse().leastOf(), this
     * test would be enough. It doesn't... but we'll cheat and act like it does
     * anyway. There's a comment there to remind us to fix this if we change it.
     */
    List<Integer> list = asList(3, 1, 3, 2, 4, 2, 4, 3);
    assertEquals(asList(4, 4, 3, 3), numberOrdering.greatestOf(list, 4));
  }