util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

Contributing
============

Keeping the project small and stable limits our ability to accept new contributors. We are not
seeking new committers at this time, but some small contributions are welcome.

If you've found a security problem, please follow our [bug bounty][security] program.

If you've found a bug, please contribute a failing test case so we can study and fix it.

If you have a new feature idea, please build it in an external library. There are

Contributing
============

Keeping the project small and stable limits our ability to accept new contributors. We are not
seeking new committers at this time, but some small contributions are welcome.

If you've found a security problem, please follow our [bug bounty][security] program.

If you've found a bug, please contribute a failing test case so we can study and fix it.

If you have a new feature idea, please build it in an external library. There are

    RowSortedTable<Character, String, Integer> table = TreeBasedTable.create();
    table.put('a', "one", 1);
    table.put('a', "two", 2);
    table.put('a', "three", 3);
    table.put('b', "four", 4);
    return unmodifiableRowSortedTable(table).row('a');
  }

    Table<String, Character, Integer> table = HashBasedTable.create();
    table.put("one", 'a', 1);
    table.put("two", 'a', 2);
    table.put("three", 'a', 3);
    table.put("four", 'b', 4);
    return unmodifiableTable(table).column('a');
  }

    String message = "Waited " + timeout + " " + unit.toString().toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT);
    // Only report scheduling delay if larger than our spin threshold - otherwise it's just noise
    if (remainingNanos + SPIN_THRESHOLD_NANOS < 0) {
      // We over-waited for our timeout.
      message += " (plus ";
      long overWaitNanos = -remainingNanos;
      long overWaitUnits = unit.convert(overWaitNanos, NANOSECONDS);

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (float value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Floats.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Float.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner") // We need to test our method.
  public void testIsFinite() {
    for (float value : NUMBERS) {