@NullUnmarked
public class NullCacheTest extends TestCase {
  QueuingRemovalListener<Object, Object> listener;

  @Override
  protected void setUp() {
    listener = queuingRemovalListener();
  }

  public void testGet() {
    Object computed = new Object();
    LoadingCache<Object, Object> cache =
        CacheBuilder.newBuilder()
            .maximumSize(0)
            .removalListener(listener)

import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/** Skeleton for a tester of a {@code BiMap}. */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.

      throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
    }
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester
  public void testNullPointers() {
    NullPointerTester tester = new NullPointerTester();
    tester.testAllPublicStaticMethods(Strings.class);
  }

import com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionSize;
import com.google.common.collect.testing.features.MapFeature;
import java.util.Iterator;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Tester for {@code Multimap.entries}.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")

Konkret geht es darum, Uvicorn, Starlette und FastAPI miteinander zu vergleichen (neben vielen anderen Tools).

Je einfacher das Problem, welches durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser ist die Performanz. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, welche das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

* **Uvicorn**: ein ASGI-Server
    * **Starlette**: (verwendet Uvicorn) ein Web-Mikroframework

import java.util.Collection;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Creates collections, containing sample elements, to be tested.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public interface TestCollectionGenerator<E extends @Nullable Object>

    public void test_setObject_noRequest() {
        // Test setObject when no HTTP request is available
        // This should not throw exception, just do nothing
        try {
            WebApiUtil.setObject("testKey", "testValue");
        } catch (Exception e) {
            fail("setObject should handle missing request gracefully: " + e.getMessage());
        }
    }

    public void test_setObject_withNullName() {

        for (int size : keySizes) {
            // Given
            byte[] testKey = new byte[size];
            new SecureRandom().nextBytes(testKey);

            // When
            byte[] derivedKey = Smb3KeyDerivation.deriveSigningKey(dialect, testKey, preauthIntegrity);

            // Then
            assertNotNull(derivedKey, "Should handle " + size + "-byte session key");

I tested several ideas in the most popular Python editors: PyCharm, VS Code, Jedi based editors.

By the last <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools" class="external-link" target="_blank">Python Developer Survey</a>, that covers about 80% of the users.

import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Set;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Encapsulates the constraints that a class under test must satisfy in order for a tester method to
 * be run against that class.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@GwtCompatible
public final class TesterRequirements {
  private final Set<Feature<?>> presentFeatures;