*       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

    // we create a test suite containing a test for every FuturesTest test method and we
    // set it as the name of the test.  Then in runTest we can reflectively load and invoke the
    // corresponding method on FuturesTest in the correct classloader.
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(AggregateFutureStateFallbackAtomicHelperTest.class.getName());
    for (Method method : FuturesTest.class.getDeclaredMethods()) {

      }
    };
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // java.lang.reflect
  private static Object invokeAccessibleNonThrowingMethod(
      Method method, Object receiver, Object... params) {
    try {
      return method.invoke(receiver, params);
    } catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
      throw new RuntimeException(e);
    } catch (InvocationTargetException e) {

        assertTrue(infoString.contains("sectPerAlloc=100"), "toString should contain sectPerAlloc");
        assertTrue(infoString.contains("bytesPerSect=512"), "toString should contain bytesPerSect");
    }

    // Helper methods to write numbers to byte array in little-endian format.
    private void writeInt2(int val, byte[] dst, int dstIndex) {
        dst[dstIndex++] = (byte) val;
        dst[dstIndex++] = (byte) (val >> 8);
    }

 * callers. Instead, accept {@link Iterable} and have your method or constructor body pass it to the
 * appropriate {@code copyOf} method itself.
 *
 * <p>Expressing the immutability guarantee directly in the type that user code references is a
 * powerful advantage. Although Java offers certain immutable collection factory methods, such as
 * {@link Collections#singleton(Object)} and <a

    }

    /**
     * Loads the list of available data store names by scanning plugin JAR files.
     * This method searches for 'fess_ds++.xml' configuration files within JAR files
     * in the data store plugin directory and extracts component class names.
     *
     * <p>The method uses secure XML parsing features to prevent XXE attacks and
     * other XML-based vulnerabilities. Component class names are extracted from

 *
 * <p>{@code ByteSource} provides two kinds of methods:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li><b>Methods that return a stream:</b> These methods should return a <i>new</i>, independent
 *       instance each time they are called. The caller is responsible for ensuring that the
 *       returned stream is closed.
 *   <li><b>Convenience methods:</b> These are implementations of common operations that are