* referencing the type variables seem worthwhile.
   */
  final void checkNoDuplicate(R rowKey, C columnKey, @Nullable V existingValue, V newValue) {
    checkArgument(
        existingValue == null,
        "Duplicate key: (row=%s, column=%s), values: [%s, %s].",
        rowKey,
        columnKey,
        newValue,
        existingValue);
  }

  // redeclare to satisfy our test for b/310253115
  @Override

$form-floating-padding-x;\n\n    &::placeholder {\n      color: transparent;\n    }\n\n    &:focus,\n    &:not(:placeholder-shown) {\n      padding-top: $form-floating-input-padding-t;\n      padding-bottom: $form-floating-input-padding-b;\n    }\n    // Duplicated because `:-webkit-autofill` invalidates other selectors when grouped\n    &:-webkit-autofill {\n      padding-top: $form-floating-input-padding-t;\n      padding-bottom: $form-floating-input-padding-b;\n    }\n  }\n\n  > .form-select {\n    padding-top:...

- Fixed a regression in default configurations, which enabled PodDisruptionConditions by default, 
  that prevented the control plane's pod garbage collector from deleting pods that contained duplicated field keys (env. variables with repeated keys or container ports). ([#121379](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/121379), [@mimowo](https://github.com/mimowo)) [SIG Apps, Auth, Node, Scheduling and Testing]

   * collection in unspecified order.
   *
   * @param collection the elements that the set should contain
   * @return a new {@code CompactHashSet} containing those elements (minus duplicates)
   */
  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> CompactHashSet<E> create(
      Collection<? extends E> collection) {
    CompactHashSet<E> set = createWithExpectedSize(collection.size());
    set.addAll(collection);

    checkNotNull(mergeFunction, "mergeFunction");

    /*
     * No mutable Table exactly matches the insertion order behavior of ImmutableTable.Builder, but
     * the Builder can't efficiently support merging of duplicate values.  Getting around this
     * requires some work.
     */

    return Collector.of(
        ImmutableTableCollectorState<R, C, V>::new,
        (state, input) ->
            state.put(

    checkNotNull(mergeFunction, "mergeFunction");

    /*
     * No mutable Table exactly matches the insertion order behavior of ImmutableTable.Builder, but
     * the Builder can't efficiently support merging of duplicate values.  Getting around this
     * requires some work.
     */

    return Collector.of(
        ImmutableTableCollectorState<R, C, V>::new,
        (state, input) ->
            state.put(

    }
  }

  // TODO: test adding element of wrong type

  /**
   * Returns {@link Method} instances for the {@code setCount()} tests that assume multisets support
   * duplicates so that the test of {@code Multisets.forSet()} can suppress them.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static List<Method> getSetCountDuplicateInitializingMethods() {
    return asList(

    Map<Integer, String> expected = new LinkedHashMap<>();
    for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
      // Truncate to even key, so we have put(0, "0") then put(0, "1"). Half the entries are
      // duplicates.
      Integer key = i & ~1;
      String value = String.valueOf(i);
      builder.put(key, value);
      expected.put(key, value);
    }
    ImmutableMap<Integer, String> map = builder.buildKeepingLast();

        }
        if (elements.length > 0) {
          multiset1.add(elements[0]);
        }
        if (elements.length > 1) {
          /*
           * When a test requests a multiset with duplicates, our plan of
           * "add an extra item 0 to A and an extra item 1 to B" really means
           * "add an extra item 0 to A and B," which isn't what we want.
           */

                field.setAccessible(true);
                String value = (String) field.get(null);
                assertFalse("Duplicate value found: " + value + " for field: " + field.getName(), values.contains(value));
                values.add(value);
            }
        }
    }

    /**