* Parce que les structures de données de pydantic consistent seulement en une instance de classe que vous définissez; l'auto-complétion, le linting, mypy et votre intuition devrait être largement suffisante pour valider vos données.
* Valide les **structures complexes**:

        // Values should be the same
        assertEquals("Test Fess", value1);
        assertEquals(value1, value2);
    }

    // Test property that should be consistent
    public void test_get_propertyFilter() {
        // Test a regular property that passes through
        String value = fessConfig.get("domain.title");
        assertEquals("Test Fess", value);
    }

 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods uses the set's comparator (or the natural ordering of the
 * elements, if there is no comparator) to test element equality. As a result, if the comparator is
 * not consistent with equals, some of the standard implementations may violate the {@code Set}
 * contract.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and the collection views they return are not guaranteed to be

        // Then
        assertEquals(domain, type1.getSuppliedDomain());
        assertEquals(workstation, type1.getSuppliedWorkstation());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should generate consistent byte representation")
    void testConsistentByteRepresentation() throws IOException {
        // Given
        Type1Message type1 = new Type1Message(mockContext);

        // When

 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods uses the set's comparator (or the natural ordering of the
 * elements, if there is no comparator) to test element equality. As a result, if the comparator is
 * not consistent with equals, some of the standard implementations may violate the {@code Set}
 * contract.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and the collection views they return are not guaranteed to be

    }

    // PUT /api/admin/elevateword/setting
    /**
     * Updates an existing elevate word setting.
     * Refreshes all elevate words in the suggest helper to maintain consistency.
     *
     * @param body elevate word setting data to update
     * @return JSON response with updated setting ID and status
     */
    @Execute

     * duplication of properties (multiple name/value pairs with the same name can be added).
     */
    @Override
    public String toString() {
      // create a copy to keep it consistent in case value changes
      boolean omitNullValuesSnapshot = omitNullValues;
      boolean omitEmptyValuesSnapshot = omitEmptyValues;
      String nextSeparator = "";

        /*
         * The NodeStatusResponse.readNodeNameArray method may also set this
         * information. These two places where node status data is populated should
         * be consistent. Be carefull!
         */
        this.hostName = hostName;
        this.address = address;
        this.groupName = groupName;
        this.nodeType = nodeType;
        this.isBeingDeleted = isBeingDeleted;

    writeOrCountBytes(sink, false)
  }

  /**
   * Either writes this request to [sink] or measures its content length. We have one method do
   * double-duty to make sure the counting and content are consistent, particularly when it comes
   * to awkward operations like measuring the encoded length of header strings, or the
   * length-in-digits of an encoded integer.
   */
  @Throws(IOException::class)

 * equality for both keys and values. This may not be the desired behavior for map implementations
 * that use non-standard notions of key equality, such as a {@code SortedMap} whose comparator is
 * not consistent with {@code equals}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and the collection views they return are not guaranteed to be
 * thread-safe, even when all of the methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *