if (obj instanceof Subscriber) {
      Subscriber that = (Subscriber) obj;
      // Use == so that different equal instances will still receive events.
      // We only guard against the case that the same object is registered
      // multiple times
      return target == that.target && method.equals(that.method);
    }
    return false;
  }

  /**

public interface PredecessorsFunction<N> {

  /**
   * Returns all nodes in this graph adjacent to {@code node} which can be reached by traversing
   * {@code node}'s incoming edges <i>against</i> the direction (if any) of the edge.
   *
   * <p>Some algorithms that operate on a {@code PredecessorsFunction} may produce undesired results

        // respectively. Using a simple replacement of these patterns will allow them
        // to specify the absolute path to these files in a customized components.xml
        // file. Ideally, we'd do full pattern-evaluation against the sysprops, but this
        // is a first step. There are several replacements below, in order to normalize
        // the path character before we operate on the string as a regex input, and

   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */
  private final Equivalence<? super T> equivalence;

  private final String relationshipName;
  private final String hashName;

        assertEquals(WinError.WINERR_CODES.length, WinError.WINERR_MESSAGES.length, "Codes/messages length mismatch");

        // Exact content check to guard against accidental reordering or drift
        assertArrayEquals(
                new int[] { WinError.ERROR_SUCCESS, WinError.ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED, WinError.ERROR_REQ_NOT_ACCEP, WinError.ERROR_BAD_PIPE,

      Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
      with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
      institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
      cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
      or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct

      Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
      with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
      institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
      cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
      or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct

    future. (Previously, we sometimes removed such APIs after a deprecation
    period. The last release to remove non-`@Beta` APIs was Guava 21.0.) Even
    `@Deprecated` APIs will remain (again, unless they are `@Beta`). We have no
    plans to start removing things again, but officially, we're leaving our
    options open in case of surprises (like, say, a serious security problem).

3.  Guava has one dependency that is needed for linkage at runtime:

import com.google.caliper.Benchmark;
import com.google.caliper.Param;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Iterator;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Benchmarks {@link Joiner} against some common implementations of delimiter-based string joining.
 *
 * @author Adomas Paltanavicius
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class JoinerBenchmark {

  private static final String DELIMITER_STRING = ",";

            this.execOperations = execOperations;
        }

        /**
         * Wraps `docker pull` in a retry loop, to try and provide some resilience against
         * transient errors
         * @param baseImage the image to pull.
         */
        private void pullBaseImage(String baseImage) {
            final int maxAttempts = 10;