const char* op_name_ = nullptr;
  // TODO(srbs): Use this.
  string device_name_;
};

// GraphContext wraps a TF_Graph modeling a single function and manages the
// "execution" of operation, i.e. adding them to the function.
class GraphContext : public TracingContext {
 public:
  explicit GraphContext(const char* name)
      : TracingContext(kGraph),
        graph_(new TF_Graph(), TF_DeleteGraph),

			podIPs := util.GetPodIPsIfPresent(pod)
			if len(podIPs) == 0 {
				log.Debugf("pod update event skipped: no IP assigned yet")
				return nil
			}

			log.Debugf("pod is now enrolled, adding to mesh")
			err := s.dataplane.AddPodToMesh(s.ctx, pod, podIPs, "")
			if err != nil {
				log.Warnf("AddPodToMesh returned: %v", err)
			}
		}
	case controllers.EventDelete:

	paxGNUSparseRealSize  = "GNU.sparse.realsize"
)

// basicKeys is a set of the PAX keys for which we have built-in support.
// This does not contain "charset" or "comment", which are both PAX-specific,
// so adding them as first-class features of Header is unlikely.
// Users can use the PAXRecords field to set it themselves.
var basicKeys = map[string]bool{
	paxPath: true, paxLinkpath: true, paxSize: true, paxUid: true, paxGid: true,

But then, the project's focus shifted.

It was no longer an API web framework, as the creator needed to focus on Starlette.

### Container Images

All container images are available as manifest lists and support the described
architectures. It is also possible to pull a specific architecture directly by
adding the "-$ARCH" suffix  to the container image name.

name | architectures
---- | -------------

import java.util.Set;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * CompactHashSet is an implementation of a Set. All optional operations (adding and removing) are
 * supported. The elements can be any objects.
 *
 * <p>{@code contains(x)}, {@code add(x)} and {@code remove(x)}, are all (expected and amortized)

You can also use `response_model=None` to disable creating a response model for that *path operation*, you might need to do it if you are adding type annotations for things that are not valid Pydantic fields, you will see an example of that in one of the sections below.

## Return the same input data

  public static class Builder<C extends Comparable<?>> {
    private final List<Range<C>> ranges;

    public Builder() {
      this.ranges = Lists.newArrayList();
    }

    // TODO(lowasser): consider adding union, in addition to add, that does allow overlap

    /**
     * Add the specified range to this builder. Adjacent ranges are permitted and will be merged,

    // Make a copy so that we can mutate it.
    FunctionDef fdef_to_load = fdef;
    if (mutate_proto_func) {
      (*mutate_proto_func)(&fdef_to_load);
    }
    VLOG(1) << "Adding func to graph: " << fdef_to_load.DebugString();
    std::vector<char> binary_proto_buf(fdef_to_load.ByteSizeLong());
    fdef_to_load.SerializeToArray(binary_proto_buf.data(),

  // safely publish these objects and we won't need this whole discussion.
  // TODO(user,lukes): consider adding volatile to all these fields since in current known JVMs
  // that should resolve the issue. This comes at the cost of adding more write barriers to the
  // implementations.

  private Futures() {}

  /**