//
    // All this makes me really wonder if there's any value in queueing here at all. A dispatcher
    // that simply loops through the subscribers and dispatches the event to each would actually
    // probably provide a stronger order guarantee, though that order would obviously be different
    // in some cases.

    /** Global event queue. */
    private final ConcurrentLinkedQueue<EventWithSubscriber> queue = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<>();

  A contributor's "essential patent claims" are all patent claims
owned or controlled by the contributor, whether already acquired or
hereafter acquired, that would be infringed by some manner, permitted
by this License, of making, using, or selling its contributor version,
but do not include claims that would be infringed only as a
consequence of further modification of the contributor version.  For

The OpenAPI schema is what powers the two interactive documentation systems included.

And there are dozens of alternatives, all based on OpenAPI. You could easily add any of those alternatives to your application built with **FastAPI**.

You could also use it to generate code automatically, for clients that communicate with your API. For example, frontend, mobile or IoT applications.

		return
	}

	listObjectVersions := objectAPI.ListObjectVersions

	// Initiate a list object versions operation based on the input params.
	// On success would return back ListObjectsInfo object to be
	// marshaled into S3 compatible XML header.
	listObjectVersionsInfo, err := listObjectVersions(ctx, bucket, prefix, marker, versionIDMarker, delimiter, maxkeys)
	if err != nil {

`OAuth2PasswordBearer` makes **FastAPI** know that it is a security scheme. So it is added that way to OpenAPI.

But `OAuth2PasswordRequestForm` is just a class dependency that you could have written yourself, or you could have declared `Form` parameters directly.

But as it's a common use case, it is provided by **FastAPI** directly, just to make it easier.

///

### Use the form data { #use-the-form-data }

        return keyGenerator.getAndIncrement();
    }

    @Override
    protected long getBufferAddress(ByteBuffer buffer) {
        // Return a fake address for TCP
        // In real RDMA implementations, this would be the native memory address
        return buffer.hashCode();
    }

     */
    @Test
    void testSuccessfulHandshake() throws IOException, SecurityException {
        // This test is simplified to verify basic handshake behavior
        // Full NTLM handshake testing would require more complex mocking

        // Arrange - Mock a server that supports NTLM
        mockResponse(HTTP_UNAUTHORIZED, "Unauthorized", Collections.singletonMap("WWW-Authenticate", Collections.singletonList("NTLM")),

b.io/okhttp/4.x/okhttp/okhttp3/-tls-version/) and [cipher suites](https://square.github.io/okhttp/4.x/okhttp/okhttp3/-cipher-suite/) to offer. A client that wants to maximize connectivity would include obsolete TLS versions and weak-by-design cipher suites. A strict client that wants to maximize security would be limited to only the latest TLS version and strongest cipher suites.

Specific security vs. connectivity decisions are implemented by [ConnectionSpec](https://square.github.io/ok...

						all = append(all, recDst)
					}
				}()
				if err != nil {
					in.err = err
				}
				// We don't need the input any more.
				//nolint:staticcheck // SA6002 Using pointer would allocate more since we would have to copy slice header before taking a pointer.
				r.bufferPool.Put(in.input)
				in.input = nil
				in.dst <- all
			}
		}()
	}
	return nil
}

          // caught and forwarded to the service the task would stop executing but the service would
          // have no idea.
          // TODO(lukes): consider building everything in terms of ListenableScheduledFuture then
          // the AbstractService could monitor the future directly. Rescheduling is still hard...
          // but it would help with some of these lock ordering issues.
          scheduleFailure = e;