builder.append(args[i++]);
      templateStart = placeholderStart + 2;
    }
    builder.append(template.substring(templateStart));

    // if we run out of placeholders, append the extra args in square braces
    if (i < args.length) {
      builder.append(" [");
      builder.append(args[i++]);
      while (i < args.length) {
        builder.append(", ");
        builder.append(args[i++]);
      }

   * it is returned directly. Otherwise, a new array of size {@code minLength + padding} is
   * returned, containing the values of {@code array}, and zeroes in the remaining places.
   *
   * @param array the source array
   * @param minLength the minimum length the returned array must guarantee
   * @param padding an extra amount to "grow" the array by if growth is necessary

    assertEquals(0, (int) ictim.getInstance(Integer.class));
    assertEquals(1, (int) ictim.getInstance(int.class));
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // TODO(cpovirk): Can we at least use Class<?> in some places?
  abstract static class TestClassToInstanceMapGenerator implements TestMapGenerator<Class, Impl> {

    @Override
    public Class<?>[] createKeyArray(int length) {
      return new Class<?>[length];
    }

 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public abstract class ForwardingList<E extends @Nullable Object> extends ForwardingCollection<E>
    implements List<E> {
  // TODO(lowasser): identify places where thread safety is actually lost

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected ForwardingList() {}

  @Override
  protected abstract List<E> delegate();

  @Override

  /**
   * Closed addressing tends to perform well even with high load factors. Being conservative here
   * ensures that the table is still likely to be relatively sparse (hence it misses fast) while
   * saving space.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting static final double MAX_LOAD_FACTOR = 1.2;

  /**
   * Maximum allowed false positive probability of detecting a hash flooding attack given random
   * input.
   */

    client.send(message4)
    serverListener.assertTextMessage(message4)

    // Server to client message that shares context with message1.
    val message5 = message1 + message1
    server.send(message5)
    clientListener.assertTextMessage(message5)

    // Client to server message that shares context with message2.
    val message6 = message2 + message2
    client.send(message6)

 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public class Joiner {
  /** Returns a joiner which automatically places {@code separator} between consecutive elements. */
  public static Joiner on(String separator) {
    return new Joiner(separator);
  }

  /** Returns a joiner which automatically places {@code separator} between consecutive elements. */
  public static Joiner on(char separator) {

                CollectionSize.ANY)
            .createTestSuite());
    suite.addTestSuite(HashMultimapTest.class);
    return suite;
  }

  /*
   * The behavior of toString() is tested by TreeMultimap, which shares a
   * lot of code with HashMultimap and has deterministic iteration order.
   */
  public void testCreate() {
    HashMultimap<String, Integer> multimap = HashMultimap.create();
    multimap.put("foo", 1);

                CollectionSize.ANY)
            .createTestSuite());
    suite.addTestSuite(HashMultimapTest.class);
    return suite;
  }

  /*
   * The behavior of toString() is tested by TreeMultimap, which shares a
   * lot of code with HashMultimap and has deterministic iteration order.
   */
  public void testCreate() {
    HashMultimap<String, Integer> multimap = HashMultimap.create();
    multimap.put("foo", 1);

   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to
   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not