* reduced the available size of the buffer each time a call to read didn't fill up the available
   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size
   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.
   */

     * The specific problem we had was unsafe reads of lastEntryReturnedBySomeIterator. (To fix the
     * problem, we've since marked that field as volatile.)
     *
     * When MapIteratorCache is used from Immutable* classes, the TSAN failure doesn't indicate a
     * real problem: The Entry objects are ImmutableMap entries, whose fields are all final and thus

 * https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v27.0) This means that the copy of ListenableFuture
 * in com.google.guava:guava differs from the "frozen" copy in the listenablefuture artifact. This
 * could in principle cause problems for some users. Still, we expect that the benefits of the
 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have

 * https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v27.0) This means that the copy of ListenableFuture
 * in com.google.guava:guava differs from the "frozen" copy in the listenablefuture artifact. This
 * could in principle cause problems for some users. Still, we expect that the benefits of the
 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have

  /**
   * Handles cases of updates involving initialization, resizing, creating new Cells, and/or
   * contention. See above for explanation. This method suffers the usual non-modularity problems of
   * optimistic retry code, relying on rechecked sets of reads.
   *
   * @param x the value
   * @param hc the hash code holder
   * @param wasUncontended false if CAS failed before call
   */

   * {@code [1]} and {@code [1, 1]}).
   */
  // Note: 90% of the time we don't add type parameters or wildcards that serve only to "tweak" the
  // desired return type. However, *nested* generics introduce a special class of problems that we
  // think tip it over into being worthwhile.
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, S extends T> Comparator<Iterable<S>> lexicographical(
      Comparator<T> comparator) {

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[16] *}

Immer wenn jetzt ein Browser einen Benutzer mit Passwort erzeugt, gibt die API dasselbe Passwort in der Response zurück.

Hier ist das möglicherweise kein Problem, da es derselbe Benutzer ist, der das Passwort sendet.

Aber wenn wir dasselbe Modell für eine andere *Pfadoperation* verwenden, könnten wir das Passwort dieses Benutzers zu jedem Client schicken.

/// danger | Gefahr

   * problematic AtomicReferenceFieldUpdaterAtomicHelper code path. However, the same problem *does*
   * matter with AggregateFutureState, which does not have an Unsafe-based helper.
   *
   * This same problem is one of the reasons for us to likewise use package-private for the fields
   * in Waiter.
   */

  /**

## Website

[fess.codelibs.org](https://fess.codelibs.org/)

## Probleme/Fragen

[discuss.codelibs.org](https://discuss.codelibs.org/c/FessEN/)

## Erste Schritte

    * Quelle que soit la taille de votre serveur ou la taille de chacune des applications qu'il contient.
    * Il existe cependant une solution à ce problème.
* Il existe une extension du protocole TLS (celui qui gère le cryptage au niveau TCP, avant HTTP) appelée <a
  href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication" class="external-link" target="_blank"><abbr