// we create a test suite containing a test for every FuturesTest test method and we
    // set it as the name of the test.  Then in runTest we can reflectively load and invoke the
    // corresponding method on FuturesTest in the correct classloader.
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(AggregateFutureStateFallbackAtomicHelperTest.class.getName());
    for (Method method : FuturesTest.class.getDeclaredMethods()) {

import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;

/**
 * Factory methods for {@link ExecutorService} for testing.
 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 * @since 14.0
 */
@GwtIncompatible
public final class TestingExecutors {
  private TestingExecutors() {}

  /**
   * Returns a {@link ScheduledExecutorService} that never executes anything.
   *
   * <p>The {@code shutdownNow} method of the returned executor always returns an empty list despite

 * provided {@code standardPutAll} method.
 *
 * <p><b>{@code default} method warning:</b> This class does <i>not</i> forward calls to {@code
 * default} methods. Instead, it inherits their default implementations. When those implementations
 * invoke methods, they invoke methods on the {@code ForwardingNavigableMap}.
 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods uses the map's comparator (or the natural ordering of the

 * provided {@code standardPutAll} method.
 *
 * <p><b>{@code default} method warning:</b> This class does <i>not</i> forward calls to {@code
 * default} methods. Instead, it inherits their default implementations. When those implementations
 * invoke methods, they invoke methods on the {@code ForwardingNavigableMap}.
 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods uses the map's comparator (or the natural ordering of the

### Key Design Patterns

1. **Fluent Builder Pattern**: `CurlRequest` uses method chaining for configuration
2. **Factory Pattern**: `Curl` class provides static factory methods for each HTTP method
3. **Resource Management**: `CurlResponse` implements `Closeable` for try-with-resources

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code