For example, if the client tries to send a `santa_tracker` cookie with a value of `good-list-please`, the client will receive an **error** response telling them that the `santa_tracker` <abbr title="Santa disapproves the lack of cookies. 🎅 Okay, no more cookie jokes.">cookie is not allowed</abbr>:

```json
{
    "detail": [

            throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
        }
        return this.dialect;
    }

    /**
     * Check if this dialect version is at least the specified version
     *
     * @param v the version to compare against
     * @return whether this version is a least the given one
     */
    public boolean atLeast(final DialectVersion v) {
        return ordinal() >= v.ordinal();
    }

    /**

---
name: Questions
about: See discuss.codelibs.org
title: 'DO NOT CREATE ME'
labels: ''
assignees: ''

---

 *  * All other characters are copied without transformation.
 *
 * @param alreadyEncoded true to leave '%' as-is; false to convert it to '%25'.
 * @param strict true to encode '%' if it is not the prefix of a valid percent encoding.
 * @param plusIsSpace true to encode '+' as "%2B" if it is not already encoded.
 * @param unicodeAllowed true to leave non-ASCII codepoint unencoded.
 * @param charset which charset to use, null equals UTF-8.
 */

        // After encoding, check how many bytes were used
        int bytesUsed = buf.getIndex();
        // Should be 2 bytes for the short value (alignment may add padding)
        assertTrue(bytesUsed >= 2, "Should use at least 2 bytes for short");

        // Reset index to read back
        buf.reset();
        NdrShort decoded = new NdrShort(0); // placeholder value
        decoded.decode(buf);

클라이언트가 **추가 쿠키**를 보내려고 시도하면, **오류** 응답을 받게 됩니다.

<abbr title="이건 또 다른 농담입니다. 제 말에 귀 기울이지 마세요. 커피랑 쿠키 좀 드세요. ☕">API가 거부</abbr>하는데도 동의를 얻기 위해 애쓰는 불쌍한 쿠키 배너(팝업)들. 🍪

예를 들어, 클라이언트가 `good-list-please` 값으로 `santa_tracker` 쿠키를 보내려고 하면 클라이언트는 `santa_tracker` <abbr title="산타는 쿠키가 부족한 것을 못마땅해합니다. 🎅 알겠습니다, 쿠키 농담은 이제 없습니다.">쿠키가 허용되지 않는다</abbr>는 **오류** 응답을 받게 됩니다:

```json
{
    "detail": [
        {

labels.searchoptions_menu_labels=Labels
labels.error_title=Error
labels.system_error_title=System Error
labels.contact_site_admin=Please contact your site administrator.
labels.request_error_title=Invalid Request Format.
labels.bad_request=Your request to the URL is invalid.
labels.page_not_found_title=Page Not Found.
labels.check_url=Please check the URL.
labels.user_name=Username
labels.login=Login
labels.login.placeholder_username=Username

     copy of the boilerplate license comment (can be copied from an existing
     file).
  3. Files should be formatted according to Google's [Java style guide][].
  4. Please squash all commits for a change into a single commit (this can be
     done using `git rebase -i`). Do your best to have a
     [well-formed commit message][] for the change.

 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?
 *   <li>In at least one case, a use of {@code sun.misc.FpUtils}, the test will not even
 *       <i>compile</i> against Android. Now, this might be an artifact of our build system, one

    for (ClassInfo info : ClassPath.from(getClass().getClassLoader()).getAllClasses()) {
      if (!GUAVA_PACKAGES.contains(info.getPackageName())) {
        continue;
      }
      if (
      /*
       * At least one of the classes nested inside TypeResolverTest triggers a bug under older JDKs:
       * https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8215328 -> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8215470