}

        // Perform a partition with the selected median.
        int low = from + 1, high = to; // Indexes for partitioning.
        double partition = array[from + 1]; // Choose partitioning element.
        while (true) {
          // Skip the elements smaller than the partition.
          do {
            low++;
          } while (array[low] < partition);

          // Skip the elements larger than the partition.

  static final Iterable<Integer> ALL_INTEGER_CANDIDATES;

  static {
    ImmutableSet.Builder<Integer> intValues = ImmutableSet.builder();
    // Add boundary values manually to avoid over/under flow (this covers 2^N for 0 and 31).
    intValues.add(Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
    // Add values up to 40. This covers cases like "square of a prime" and such.
    for (int i = 1; i <= 40; i++) {

/**
 * Tests for SmbFilenameFilter interface behaviors via simple implementations.
 * Each test creates a concrete filter to validate expected contract semantics
 * including normal operation, null handling, edge cases, and exception flow.
 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class SmbFilenameFilterTest {

    @Mock
    SmbFile mockDir;

    /**
     * Happy-path: a filter that accepts any name.
     */
    @ParameterizedTest

   *         <li><b>If the next character was a valid low surrogate, the code point value of the
   *             high/low surrogate pair is returned.</b>
   *         <li>If the next character was not a low surrogate value, then {@link
   *             IllegalArgumentException} is thrown.
   *       </ol>
   *   <li>If the first character was a low surrogate value, {@link IllegalArgumentException} is
   *       thrown.

The most common is the implicit flow.

The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

            ) : {};

            isValid = qp.state === sentState;

            if ((
              oauth2.auth.schema.get("flow") === "accessCode" ||
              oauth2.auth.schema.get("flow") === "authorizationCode" ||
              oauth2.auth.schema.get("flow") === "authorization_code"
            ) && !oauth2.auth.code) {
                if (!isValid) {
                    oauth2.errCb({

И им также можете пользоваться вы сами, чтобы отлаживать, проверять и тестировать то же самое приложение.

## «`password` flow» (аутентификация по паролю) { #the-password-flow }

Теперь давайте немного вернемся и разберемся, что это все такое.

«`password` flow» — это один из способов («flows»), определенных в OAuth2, для обеспечения безопасности и аутентификации.

    private fun ByteString.binarySearch(
      labels: Array<ByteString>,
      labelIndex: Int,
    ): String? {
      var low = 0
      var high = size
      var match: String? = null
      while (low < high) {
        var mid = (low + high) / 2
        // Search for a '\n' that marks the start of a value. Don't go back past the start of the
        // array.

        }

        for (int i = 1; i < versions.length; i++) {
            Comparable low = c[i - 1];
            for (int j = i; j < versions.length; j++) {
                Comparable high = c[j];
                assertTrue(low.compareTo(high) < 0, "expected " + low + " < " + high);
                assertTrue(high.compareTo(low) > 0, "expected " + high + " > " + low);
            }
        }
    }

Am häufigsten ist der „Implicit“-Flow.

Am sichersten ist der „Code“-Flow, die Implementierung ist jedoch komplexer, da mehr Schritte erforderlich sind. Da er komplexer ist, schlagen viele Anbieter letztendlich den „Implicit“-Flow vor.

/// note | Hinweis