* }
 *
 * Instead, you can pass a lambda expression to the {@code using} factory method:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * TreeTraverser<NodeType> traverser = TreeTraverser.using(node -> node.getChildNodes());
 * }
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 15.0
 * @deprecated Use {@link com.google.common.graph.Traverser} instead. All instance methods have
 *     their equivalent on the result of {@code Traverser.forTree(tree)} where {@code tree}

      throw new UncheckedExecutionException(cause);
    }
    throw newWithCause(exceptionClass, cause);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(user): FutureChecker interface for these to be static methods on? If so, refer to it in
   * the (static-method) Futures.getChecked documentation
   */

  private static boolean hasConstructorUsableByGetChecked(
      Class<? extends Exception> exceptionClass) {
    try {

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 * <h3>Extension</h3>
 *
 * If you want a class like {@code FluentFuture} but with extra methods, we recommend declaring your
 * own subclass of {@link ListenableFuture}, complete with a method like {@link #from} to adapt an
 * existing {@code ListenableFuture}, implemented atop a {@link ForwardingListenableFuture} that
 * forwards to that future and adds the desired methods.
 */
@GwtCompatible

			subrouter.Methods(http.MethodPost).Path(storageRESTVersionPrefix + storageRESTMethodDeleteVersions).HandlerFunc(h(server.DeleteVersionsHandler))
			subrouter.Methods(http.MethodPost).Path(storageRESTVersionPrefix + storageRESTMethodVerifyFile).HandlerFunc(h(server.VerifyFileHandler))
			subrouter.Methods(http.MethodPost).Path(storageRESTVersionPrefix + storageRESTMethodStatInfoFile).HandlerFunc(h(server.StatInfoFile))