void testDataHandlingWithVariousSizes() {
        // Test with small data count
        response.setDataCount(10);
        assertEquals(10, response.getDataCount());

        // Test with large data count
        response.setDataCount(65535);
        assertEquals(65535, response.getDataCount());

        // Test with zero data count
        response.setDataCount(0);

         * than a handful of exceptions. But it seems prudent to set a cap on how many we'll cache.
         * This avoids out-of-control memory consumption, and it keeps the cache from growing so
         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope

   * safe range. If {@code safeMax < safeMin} then no code points are considered safe. This
   * initializer is useful when explicit instances of ArrayBasedEscaperMap are used to allow the
   * sharing of large replacement mappings.
   *
   * <p>If a code point has no mapped replacement then it is checked against the safe range. If it
   * lies outside that, then {@link #escapeUnsafe} is called, otherwise no escaping is performed.
   *

        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Edge Case Tests")
    class EdgeCaseTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle large buffer encoding")
        void testLargeBufferEncode() {
            byte[] largeName = new byte[1024];
            Arrays.fill(largeName, (byte) 'X');
            byte[] largeData = new byte[2048];

        // Prepare test data
        ByteBuffer bb = ByteBuffer.wrap(testBuffer).order(ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN);

        // Header
        bb.putShort((short) 3); // version
        bb.putShort((short) 100); // size (large enough for all strings)
        bb.putShort((short) 1); // serverType
        bb.putShort((short) 0); // rflags (no name list)
        bb.putShort((short) 5); // proximity
        bb.putShort((short) 300); // ttl

        // Act
        int bytesWritten = trans.writeDataWireFormat(dst, 0);

        // Assert
        assertEquals(0, bytesWritten);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test with large FID value")
    void testWithLargeFid() {
        // Arrange
        int largeFid = 0xFFFF;
        TransTransactNamedPipe trans = new TransTransactNamedPipe(mockConfig, largeFid, TEST_DATA, TEST_OFFSET, TEST_LENGTH);

 * @since 13.0
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
public abstract class Striped<L> {
  /**
   * If there are at least this many stripes, we assume the memory usage of a ConcurrentMap will be
   * smaller than a large array. (This assumes that in the lazy case, most stripes are unused. As
   * always, if many stripes are in use, a non-lazy striped makes more sense.)
   */
  private static final int LARGE_LAZY_CUTOFF = 1024;

        }

        // Test boundary values
        assertEquals("1bytes", MemoryUtil.byteCountToDisplaySize(1L));
        assertEquals("999bytes", MemoryUtil.byteCountToDisplaySize(999L));

        // Test very large values close to EB boundary
        assertEquals("1.024EB", MemoryUtil.byteCountToDisplaySize(FileUtils.ONE_EB));

        // Test exact thresholds
        assertEquals("1.024KB", MemoryUtil.byteCountToDisplaySize(1024L));

        assertTrue(negInfinityOpt.isPresent());
        assertTrue(Float.isInfinite(negInfinityOpt.get()));

        // Test with very large strings
        StringBuilder largeString = new StringBuilder();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
            largeString.append("x");
        }

            assertTrue(true);
        } catch (Exception e) {
            assertTrue(true);
        }
    }

    public void test_crawl_largeConfigLists() {
        // Test with large configuration lists
        List<String> webConfigIds = new ArrayList<>();
        List<String> fileConfigIds = new ArrayList<>();

        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            webConfigIds.add("webConfig" + i);