* versions of the {@link FluentFuture#catching(Class, com.google.common.base.Function)
 * FluentFuture.catching} family of methods. Those versions have slightly different signatures.
 */
abstract class GwtFluentFutureCatchingSpecialization<V extends @Nullable Object>
    extends AbstractFuture<V> {
  /*

import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME;

/**
 * Indicates that the annotated bean has a lifespan limited to a given mojo execution,
 * which means each mojo execution will result in a different instance being injected.
 * <p>
 * The following objects will be bound to the mojo execution scope:
 *     <ul>
 *         <li>{@code org.apache.maven.api.MojoExecution}</li>

## Monitoring MinIO in Kubernetes

MinIO server exposes un-authenticated liveness endpoints so Kubernetes can natively identify unhealthy MinIO containers. MinIO also exposes Prometheus compatible data on a different endpoint to enable Prometheus users to natively monitor their MinIO deployments.

## Explore Further

        assertEquals(2, tokensNull.size());
    }

    @Test
    public void testAnalyzeWithDifferentFields() {
        // Test analyze with different field settings
        String text = "test content";
        String lang = "en";

        // Test with different field names
        List<AnalyzeToken> tokensContent = analyzer.analyze(text, "content", lang);
        assertNotNull(tokensContent);

    @Test
    public void testDifferentIpsIndependent() throws Exception {
        // Different IPs should have independent limits
        for (int i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
            assertTrue(rateLimiter.checkAttempt("user1", "192.168.1." + i));
            rateLimiter.recordFailure("user1", "192.168.1." + i);
        }

        // All different IPs should still be allowed
        for (int i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {

 * ## Why another URL model?
 *
 * Java includes both [java.net.URL][URL] and [java.net.URI][URI]. We offer a new URL
 * model to address problems that the others don't.
 *
 * ### Different URLs should be different
 *
 * Although they have different content, `java.net.URL` considers the following two URLs
 * equal, and the [equals()][Object.equals] method between them returns true:
 *
 *  * https://example.net/
 *

      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Not checking the CA bit created a vulnerability in old OkHttp releases. It is exploited by
   * triggering different chains to be discovered by the TLS engine and our chain cleaner. In this
   * attack there's several different chains.
   *
   *
   * The victim's gets a non-CA certificate signed by a CA, and pins the CA root and/or
   * intermediate. This is business as usual.
   *

            assertEquals(0, (pos + padding) % 8);
        }
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should write bytes at different buffer offsets")
    void testWriteBytesAtDifferentOffsets() throws Exception {
        // Test at different offsets
        int[] offsets = { 0, 10, 50, 100, 200 };

        for (int offset : offsets) {
            // Given
            byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];

  /** Returns the connection to use, which might be different from [connection]. */
  override fun handleSuccess(): RealConnection {
    call.client.routeDatabase.connected(route)

    val connection = this.connection!!
    connection.connectionListener.connectEnd(connection, route, call)

    // If we raced another call connecting to this host, coalesce the connections. This makes for
    // 3 different lookups in the connection pool!

      }

    val trustManager = get().platformTrustManager()
    val sslContext = get().newSSLContext()
    sslContext.init(null, null, null)

    // new client, may share all same fields but likely different connection pool
    assertNotSame(
      client.routeDatabase,
      OkHttpClient
        .Builder()
        .build()
        .routeDatabase,
    )