* @param in The input stream.
     * @param params The parameters.
     * @return The extracted data.
     */
    @Override
    public ExtractData getText(final InputStream in, final Map<String, String> params) {
        validateInputStream(in);
        try (final org.apache.poi.hwpf.extractor.WordExtractor wordExtractor = new org.apache.poi.hwpf.extractor.WordExtractor(in)) {

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
met:

   * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
   * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer

Copyright (c) 2010 The win_pdh Authors. All rights reserved.

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
   notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright

- Whether the reported vulnerability exists.
- The conditions that are required such that the vulnerability can be exploited.
- The steps required to fix the vulnerability.

In general, if the vulnerability exists in one of the MinIO code bases
itself - not in a code dependency - then MinIO will, if possible, fix
the vulnerability or implement reasonable countermeasures such that the

 *
 * Tasks are bound to the [TaskQueue] they are scheduled in. Each queue is sequential and the tasks
 * within it never execute concurrently. It is an error to use a task in multiple queues.
 */
abstract class Task(
  val name: String,
  val cancelable: Boolean = true,
) {
  // Guarded by the TaskRunner.
  internal var queue: TaskQueue? = null

  /** Undefined unless this is in [TaskQueue.futureTasks]. */

         * ours as they do when they perform the same comparison in reverse. To provide that
         * behavior on all platforms, TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable
         * implementation in each of the three possible cases:
         *
         * 1. Under Android, the built-in TypeVariable implementation interoperates with ours.

    // Less than 16,384 chars, because we index on a 14-bit index in the ranges table.
    assertThat(compactTable.mappings.length).isLessThan(1 shl 14)

    // Confirm the data strings are ASCII.
    for (dataString in listOf<String>(compactTable.sections, compactTable.ranges)) {
      for (codePoint in dataString.codePoints()) {
        assertThat(codePoint and 0x7f).isEqualTo(codePoint)
      }
    }

	}

	DB.Model(&User{}).Where("name = ?", user1.Name).Count(&count1).Or("name in ?", []string{user2.Name, user3.Name}).Count(&count2)
	if count1 != 1 || count2 != 3 {
		t.Errorf("multiple count in chain should works")
	}

	tx := DB.Model(&User{}).Where("name = ?", user1.Name).Session(&gorm.Session{})
	tx.Count(&count1)
	tx.Or("name in ?", []string{user2.Name, user3.Name}).Count(&count2)
	if count1 != 1 || count2 != 3 {

            error(
                """The contributors in the release notes $releaseNotes don't match the contributors in the PRs.
                Release notes:  $contributorsInReleaseNotes
                Pull requests:  $contributorsFromPullRequests
                Missed in notes:$contributorsInPullRequestsButNotInReleaseNotes

   * hexadecimal number in lower case.
   *
   * <p>Note that if the output is considered to be a single hexadecimal number, whether this string
   * is big-endian or little-endian depends on the byte order of {@link #asBytes}. This may be
   * surprising for implementations of {@code HashCode} that represent the number in big-endian