* Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function calls to {@link #submit} and
 * {@link #submitAsync} that submitted those tasks had.
 *
 * <p>This class has limited support for cancellation and other "early completions":
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>While calls to {@code submit} and {@code submitAsync} return a {@code Future} that can be

//   "XXXXX": {
//
//   }
// }
// Here "XXXXX" depends on the backend, currently we have "fs" and "xl" implementations.
// formatMetaV1 should be inherited by backend format structs. Please look at format-fs.go
// and format-xl.go for details.

// Ideally we will never have a situation where we will have to change the
// fields of this struct and deal with related migration.
type formatMetaV1 struct {
	// Version of the format config.

  // 'inputFuture'. That field is non-final and non-volatile. There are 2 places where the
  // 'inputFuture' field is read and where we will have to consider visibility of the write
  // operation in the constructor.
  //
  // 1. In the listener that performs the callback. In this case it is fine since inputFuture is
  //    assigned prior to calling addListener, and addListener happens-before any invocation of the

https://python.plainenglish.io/building-a-restful-api-with-fastapi-secure-signup-and-login-functionality-included-45cdbcb36106 title: "Building a RESTful API with FastAPI: Secure Signup and Login Functionality Included" - author: Keshav Malik author_link: https://theinfosecguy.xyz/ link: https://blog.theinfosecguy.xyz/building-a-crud-api-with-fastapi-and-supabase-a-step-by-step-guide title: Building a CRUD API with FastAPI and Supabase - author: Adejumo Ridwan Suleiman author_link: https://www.linkedi...

There are many ways to handle security, authentication and authorization.

And it normally is a complex and "difficult" topic.

In many frameworks and systems just handling security and authentication takes a big amount of effort and code (in many cases it can be 50% or more of all the code written).

**FastAPI** provides several tools to help you deal with **Security** easily, rapidly, in a standard way, without having to study and learn all the security specifications.

	noGZFlag = 1 << iota

	// this flag enables tracing body and headers instead of just headers
	traceAllFlag

	// pass this flag to skip checking if object layer is available
	noObjLayerFlag
)

// Has checks if the given flag is enabled in `h`.
func (h hFlag) Has(flag hFlag) bool {
	// Use bitwise-AND and check if the result is non-zero.
	return h&flag != 0
}

   * HashBasedTable} and {@link TreeBasedTable} won't suffice.
   *
   * <p>The views returned by the {@code Table} methods {@link Table#column}, {@link
   * Table#columnKeySet}, and {@link Table#columnMap} have iterators that don't support {@code
   * remove()}. Otherwise, all optional operations are supported. Null row keys, columns keys, and
   * values are not supported.
   *

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
met:

   * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
   * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer

     * as well as to handle state changes in a thread-safe manner. The current state of the future
     * is held in the Sync state, and the lock is released whenever the state changes to {@link
     * #COMPLETED}, {@link #CANCELLED}, or {@link #INTERRUPTED}
     *
     * <p>To avoid races between threads doing release and acquire, we transition to the final state

* Also don't worry about style rules, there are already automatized tools checking that.

And if there's any other style or consistency need, I'll ask directly for that, or I'll add commits on top with the needed changes.

### Check the code

* Check and read the code, see if it makes sense, **run it locally** and see if it actually solves the problem.