* immediately reflected in the other. However, multiset changes may or may not be reflected in
   * any {@code Entry} instances already retrieved from the entry set (this is
   * implementation-dependent). Furthermore, implementations are not required to support
   * modifications to the entry set at all, and the {@code Entry} instances themselves don't even
   * have methods for modification. See the specific implementation class for more details on how

	public abstract fun saveFromResponse (Lokhttp3/HttpUrl;Ljava/util/List;)V
}

public final class okhttp3/CookieJar$Companion {
}

public final class okhttp3/Credentials {
	public static final field INSTANCE Lokhttp3/Credentials;
	public static final fun basic (Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String;
	public static final fun basic (Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/nio/charset/Charset;)Ljava/lang/String;

			t.Errorf("Test %d: Expected the result to `%v`, but instead got `%v`", i+1, testCase.expectedResult, actualResult)
		}
	}
}

// Provides a fully populated http request instance, fails otherwise.
func mustNewRequest(method string, urlStr string, contentLength int64, body io.ReadSeeker, t *testing.T) *http.Request {
	req, err := newTestRequest(method, urlStr, contentLength, body)
	if err != nil {

{* ../../docs_src/sql_databases/tutorial001_an_py310.py ln[40:45] hl[40:45] *}

Aquí usamos la dependencia `SessionDep` (una `Session`) para añadir el nuevo `Hero` a la instance `Session`, comiteamos los cambios a la base de datos, refrescamos los datos en el `hero` y luego lo devolvemos.

### Leer Heroes { #read-heroes }

    assertThrows(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> iia3.subArray(1, 4));
  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {

## Specifying Access Control with IAM Policies

The STS API authenticates the user by verifying the JWT provided in the request. However access to object storage resources are controlled via named IAM policies defined in the MinIO instance. Once authenticated via the STS API, the MinIO server applies one or more IAM policies to the generated credentials. MinIO's AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity implementation supports specifying IAM policies in two ways:

   *
   * <p>The returned table supports update operations as long as the input table supports the
   * analogous operation with swapped rows and columns. For example, in a {@link HashBasedTable}
   * instance, {@code rowKeySet().iterator()} supports {@code remove()} but {@code
   * columnKeySet().iterator()} doesn't. With a transposed {@link HashBasedTable}, it's the other
   * way around.
   */

In contrast to a "**container image**" that is the stored static contents, a "**container**" normally refers to the running instance, the thing that is being **executed**.

        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should have initial zero state")
        void shouldHaveInitialZeroState() {
            // Given - newly created instance
            FileFsSizeInformation freshInfo = new FileFsSizeInformation();

            // Then
            assertEquals(0L, freshInfo.getCapacity());
            assertEquals(0L, freshInfo.getFree());

        assertEquals(18, length);
    }

    @Test
    void constructor_withNetbiosNameNotNameInstance_shouldNotCopySrcHashCode() {
        // Create a mock NetbiosName that is not a Name instance
        NetbiosName mockNetbiosName = mock(NetbiosName.class);
        when(mockNetbiosName.getName()).thenReturn("MOCKNAME");
        when(mockNetbiosName.getNameType()).thenReturn(0x20);