Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final double[] VALUES = Doubles.concat(NUMBERS, new double[] {NaN});

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (double value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Doubles.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Double.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if

    return longBitsToDouble(significand | ONE_BITS);
  }

  static double bigToDouble(BigInteger x) {
    // This is an extremely fast implementation of BigInteger.doubleValue(). JDK patch pending.
    BigInteger absX = x.abs();
    int exponent = absX.bitLength() - 1;
    // exponent == floor(log2(abs(x)))
    if (exponent < Long.SIZE - 1) {
      return x.longValue();

    // TODO(lukes): assert that the logs are full of errors
  }

  /**
   * Runs the corresponding {@link FuturesTest} test method in a new classloader that disallows
   * certain core JDK classes.
   */
  private void runTestMethod(ClassLoader classLoader) throws Exception {
    ClassLoader oldClassLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();

   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if

    return new SingletonImmutableSet<>(e1);
  }

  /*
   * TODO: b/315526394 - Skip the Builder entirely for the of(...) methods, since we don't need to
   * worry that we might trigger the fallback to the JDK-backed implementation? (The varargs one
   * _could_, so we could keep it as it is. Or we could convince ourselves that hash flooding is
   * unlikely in practice there, too.)
   */

  /**

  private static final int GREATEST = Integer.MAX_VALUE;

  private static final int[] VALUES = {LEAST, (int) -1, (int) 0, (int) 1, GREATEST};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (int value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Ints.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Integer.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

    // TODO(lukes): assert that the logs are full of errors
  }

  /**
   * Runs the corresponding {@link AbstractFutureTest} test method in a new classloader that
   * disallows certain core JDK classes.
   */
  private void runTestMethod(ClassLoader classLoader) throws Exception {
    ClassLoader oldClassLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();

   * other utilities in this package.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> this method simply delegates to the JDK method {@link Float#compare}. It is
   * provided for consistency with the other primitive types, whose compare methods were not added
   * to the JDK until JDK 7.
   *
   * @param a the first {@code float} to compare
   * @param b the second {@code float} to compare

FESS_USER=${packaging.fess.user}
FESS_GROUP=${packaging.fess.group}

# The first existing directory is used for JAVA_HOME (if JAVA_HOME is not defined in $DEFAULT)
JDK_DIRS="/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/ /usr/lib/jvm/j2sdk1.8-oracle/ /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-7-oracle-x64 /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle /usr/lib/jvm/j2sdk1.7-oracle/ /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/ /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-armhf /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-i386/ /usr/lib/jvm/default-java"