if err != nil {
			if !xnet.IsNetworkOrHostDown(err, true) {
				gridLogIf(ctx, fmt.Errorf("ws writeMessage: %w", err))
			}
			return
		}
		if cap(merged) > writeBufferSize*8 {
			// If we had to send an excessively large package, reset size.
			merged = make([]byte, 0, writeBufferSize)
		}
		if !writeBuffer() {
			return
		}
	}
}

### Bug or Regression

- Fix a scheduler preemption issue where the victim pod was not deleted due to incorrect status patching. This issue occurred when the preemptor and victim pods had different QoS classes in their status, causing the preemption to fail entirely. ([#126694](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126694), [@Huang-Wei](https://github.com/Huang-Wei)) [SIG Scheduling]

- Previously, when trying to allocate devices through DRA for a node timed out, scheduling would proceed with another node if any had the necessary resources. This potentially hid that a node was ignored. Worse, if scheduling was slow overall, the pod was incorrectly moved to "unschedulable" and only retried after a periodic sweep. Now timeouts are errors that are always visible as...

### Bug or Regression

- Fix a scheduler preemption issue where the victim pod was not deleted due to incorrect status patching. This issue occurred when the preemptor and victim pods had different QoS classes in their status, causing the preemption to fail entirely. ([#126695](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126695), [@Huang-Wei](https://github.com/Huang-Wei)) [SIG Scheduling]

   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to
   * take a principled stand on this, but the amount of such code is simply overwhelming. To avoid
   * creating a lot of compile errors that users would not find to be informative, we're giving in

- The following roles have had `Watch` added to them (prefixed with `system:controller:`):
  
  - `cronjob-controller`
  - `endpoint-controller`
  - `endpointslice-controller`
  - `endpointslicemirroring-controller`

   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to
   * take a principled stand on this, but the amount of such code is simply overwhelming. To avoid
   * creating a lot of compile errors that users would not find to be informative, we're giving in

* scheduler: Fix issue were a new pod with affinity gets stuck at `creating` because the node had been deleted but the pod still exists. ([#56835](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/56835), [@wenlxie](https://github.com/wenlxie))

    val response3 = client.newCall(request).execute()
    assertThat(response3.body.string()).isEqualTo("def")
    assertThat(server.takeRequest().exchangeIndex).isEqualTo(1) // New connection.
  }

  /**
   * We had a bug where we'd perform infinite retries of route that fail with connection shutdown
   * errors. The problem was that the logic that decided whether to reuse a route didn't track

		// coming from a policy claim based openid provider.
		roleArns := puInfo.roleArns.ToSlice()
		var roleArn string
		if len(roleArns) == 0 {
			iamLogIf(GlobalContext,
				fmt.Errorf("parentUser: %s had no roleArns mapped!", parentUser))
			continue
		}
		roleArn = roleArns[0]
		u, err := sys.OpenIDConfig.LookupUser(roleArn, puInfo.subClaimValue)
		if err != nil {
			iamLogIf(GlobalContext, err)