* fit comfortably within a single ethernet packet (1500 bytes) even with framing overhead.
     *
     * For tests this must be big enough to realize real compression on test messages like
     * 'aaaaaaaaaa...'. Our tests check if compression was applied just by looking at the size if
     * the inbound buffer.
     */

        .url(server.url("/"))
        .post(AsyncRequestBody())
        .build()
    val call = client.newCall(request)
    call
      .timeout()
      .timeout(500, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS) // Long enough for the first TLS handshake.
    call.execute().use { response ->
      val requestBody = (call.request().body as AsyncRequestBody?)!!.takeSink()
      val responseBody = response.body.source()

    assertEquals(1, map.segments[3].table.length());
  }

  public void testInitialCapacity_large() {
    CacheBuilder.newBuilder().initialCapacity(Integer.MAX_VALUE);
    // that the builder didn't blow up is enough;
    // don't actually create this monster!
  }

  public void testConcurrencyLevel_zero() {
    CacheBuilder<Object, Object> builder = CacheBuilder.newBuilder();

    assertEquals(1, map.segments[3].table.length());
  }

  public void testInitialCapacity_large() {
    CacheBuilder.newBuilder().initialCapacity(Integer.MAX_VALUE);
    // that the builder didn't blow up is enough;
    // don't actually create this monster!
  }

  public void testConcurrencyLevel_zero() {
    CacheBuilder<Object, Object> builder = CacheBuilder.newBuilder();

// a list of exported functions, and the actual AST, to be rewritten and
// printed.
func (f *File) ParseGo(abspath string, src []byte) {
	// Two different parses: once with comments, once without.
	// The printer is not good enough at printing comments in the
	// right place when we start editing the AST behind its back,
	// so we use ast1 to look for the doc comments on import "C"
	// and on exported functions, and we use ast2 for translating

       *   so that it can call getNextSchedule).
       *
       * Maybe there is a way to avoid this cycle. But we think the cycle is safe enough to ignore:
       * Each task is retained for only as long as it is running -- so it's retained only as long as
       * it would already be retained by the underlying executor.
       *

        }
      };

  public void testAnyAndNone_logicalOps() throws Exception {
    // These are testing behavior that's never promised by the API, but since
    // we're lucky enough that these do pass, it saves us from having to write
    // more excruciating tests! Hooray!

    assertSame(CharMatcher.any(), CharMatcher.none().negate());
    assertSame(CharMatcher.none(), CharMatcher.any().negate());

                                                   TF_Status* status);

// Returns the shape of the Tensor referenced by `output` in `graph`
// into `dims`. `dims` must be an array large enough to hold `num_dims`
// entries (e.g., the return value of TF_GraphGetTensorNumDims).
//
// If the number of dimensions in the shape is unknown or the shape is

In this case, it would be better to get **one extra server** and run some processes on it so that they all have **enough RAM and CPU time**.

	return err
}

func (z *erasureServerPools) checkIfRebalanceDone(poolIdx int) bool {
	z.rebalMu.Lock()
	defer z.rebalMu.Unlock()

	// check if enough objects have been rebalanced
	r := z.rebalMeta
	poolStats := r.PoolStats[poolIdx]
	if poolStats.Info.Status == rebalCompleted {
		return true
	}