will have to make sure that it's a single process running those previous steps *even* if afterwards, you start **multiple processes** (multiple workers) for the application itself. If those steps were run by **multiple processes**, they would **duplicate** the work by running it in **parallel**, and if the steps were something delicate like a database migration, they could cause conflicts with each other.

Of course, there are some cases where there's no problem in running the previous...

   *
   * <p>Because a {@code SetMultimap} has unique values for a given key, this method returns a
   * {@link Set}, instead of the {@link Collection} specified in the {@link Multimap} interface.
   *
   * <p>Any duplicates in {@code values} will be stored in the multimap once.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  public Set<V> replaceValues(@ParametricNullness K key, Iterable<? extends V> values) {

            "The process cannot access the file because another process has locked a portion of the file.", "The disk is full.",
            "A duplicate name exists on the network.", "The network name cannot be found.", "ERRnomoreconn.", "The file exists.",
            "The parameter is incorrect.", "Too many Uids active on this session.",

            "The process cannot access the file because another process has locked a portion of the file.", "The disk is full.",
            "A duplicate name exists on the network.", "The network name cannot be found.", "ERRnomoreconn.", "The file exists.",
            "The parameter is incorrect.", "Too many Uids active on this session.",

    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this
    // one. (StringCoding$StringDecoder vs. StreamDecoder).  StringCoding has a ton of special cases
    // theoretically we could duplicate all that logic here to try to beat 'new String' or at least
    // come close.
    USING_DECODER_WITH_SIZE_HINT {
      @Override
      String read(ByteSource byteSource, Charset cs) throws IOException {

        valuesBuilder.add(requireNonNull(stream.readObject()));
      }
      ImmutableSet<Object> valueSet = valuesBuilder.build();
      if (valueSet.size() != valueCount) {
        throw new InvalidObjectException("Duplicate key-value pairs exist for key " + key);
      }
      builder.put(key, valueSet);
      tmpSize += valueCount;
    }

    ImmutableMap<Object, ImmutableSet<Object>> tmpMap;
    try {

    @Override
    public void setUp() throws Exception {
        super.setUp();
        indexUpdateCallback = new FileListIndexUpdateCallbackImpl(null, null, 1);
    }

    /** Case 1: Normal merge (no duplicates) */
    public void test_mergeResponseData_noOverwrite() {
        Map<String, Object> dataMap = new HashMap<>();
        dataMap.put("a", "A0");
        Map<String, Object> responseDataMap = new HashMap<>();

    assertFalse(getMultiset().retainAll(singleton(e0())));
    expectContents(contents);
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@link Method} instances for the remove tests that assume multisets support duplicates
   * so that the test of {@code Multisets.forSet()} can suppress them.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static List<Method> getRemoveDuplicateInitializingMethods() {

    assertFalse(getMultiset().retainAll(singleton(e0())));
    expectContents(contents);
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@link Method} instances for the remove tests that assume multisets support duplicates
   * so that the test of {@code Multisets.forSet()} can suppress them.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static List<Method> getRemoveDuplicateInitializingMethods() {

        valuesBuilder.add(requireNonNull(stream.readObject()));
      }
      ImmutableSet<Object> valueSet = valuesBuilder.build();
      if (valueSet.size() != valueCount) {
        throw new InvalidObjectException("Duplicate key-value pairs exist for key " + key);
      }
      builder.put(key, valueSet);
      tmpSize += valueCount;
    }

    ImmutableMap<Object, ImmutableSet<Object>> tmpMap;
    try {