- Sort Score
- Result 10 results
- Languages All
Results 141 - 150 of 162 for Benchmark (0.06 sec)
-
docs/tr/docs/async.md
### Eşzamanlılık paralellikten daha mı iyi? Hayır! Hikayenin ahlakı bu değil.
Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:56:21 UTC 2025 - 21.8K bytes - Viewed (0) -
cmd/erasure-decode_test.go
} got := buf.Bytes() if !bytes.Equal(expected, got) { t.Fatalf("read data is different from what was expected, offset=%d length=%d", offset, readLen) } buf.Reset() } } // Benchmarks func benchmarkErasureDecode(data, parity, dataDown, parityDown int, size int64, b *testing.B) { setup, err := newErasureTestSetup(b, data, parity, blockSizeV2) if err != nil {
Registered: Sun Dec 28 19:28:13 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Fri Aug 29 02:39:48 UTC 2025 - 21K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/ru/docs/async.md
### Конкурентность лучше параллелизма? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Tue Sep 30 11:24:39 UTC 2025 - 38.5K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/tr/docs/alternatives.md
/// ## Karşılaştırma ve Hız
Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sat Oct 11 17:48:49 UTC 2025 - 28.7K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/uk/docs/alternatives.md
/// ## Орієнтири та швидкість
Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sat Oct 11 17:48:49 UTC 2025 - 38.1K bytes - Viewed (0) -
guava/src/com/google/common/util/concurrent/CycleDetectingLockFactory.java
* weak references. * * <p><strong>Performance</strong> * * <p>The extra bookkeeping done by cycle detecting locks comes at some cost to performance. * Benchmarks (as of December 2011) show that: * * <ul> * <li>for an unnested {@code lock()} and {@code unlock()}, a cycle detecting lock takes 38ns as * opposed to the 24ns taken by a plain lock.
Registered: Fri Dec 26 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Thu Sep 11 17:06:34 UTC 2025 - 35.9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/pt/docs/async.md
### Concorrência é melhor que paralelismo? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Nov 12 16:23:57 UTC 2025 - 25.8K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/en/docs/async.md
And as you can have parallelism and asynchronicity at the same time, you get higher performance than most of the tested NodeJS frameworks and on par with Go, which is a compiled language closer to C <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(all thanks to Starlette)</a>. ### Is concurrency better than parallelism? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }
Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:56:21 UTC 2025 - 24K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/es/docs/async.md
Y como puedes tener paralelismo y asincronía al mismo tiempo, obtienes un mayor rendimiento que la mayoría de los frameworks de NodeJS probados y a la par con Go, que es un lenguaje compilado más cercano a C <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(todo gracias a Starlette)</a>. ### ¿Es la concurrencia mejor que el paralelismo? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }
Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Dec 17 10:15:01 UTC 2025 - 25.4K bytes - Viewed (0) -
docs/de/docs/async.md
### Ist Nebenläufigkeit besser als Parallelität? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }Registered: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sat Sep 20 15:10:09 UTC 2025 - 27.9K bytes - Viewed (0)